2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derived functions combine yield-salinity equations [92] with yield-ET equations [119]. The resulting equation provides a first approximation of the reduction in evapotranspiration expected under various salinity conditions and has been widely used in field conditions (e.g., [120][121][122]). Crop yields remain at potential levels until a specific threshold of electrical conductivity of the saturated soil water extract (EC e threshold ) is reached [99,118].…”
Section: Salinity and Water Productivity In The Msrpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derived functions combine yield-salinity equations [92] with yield-ET equations [119]. The resulting equation provides a first approximation of the reduction in evapotranspiration expected under various salinity conditions and has been widely used in field conditions (e.g., [120][121][122]). Crop yields remain at potential levels until a specific threshold of electrical conductivity of the saturated soil water extract (EC e threshold ) is reached [99,118].…”
Section: Salinity and Water Productivity In The Msrpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential evapotranspiration of bare land is PET 1 . In order to simulate the soil water balance when sunflowers were planted, the dual crop coefficient [38,39] method was used to calculate crop transpiration (T c ) and soil evaporation (E s ), respectively, to estimate potential evapotranspiration (PET 2 ) during sunflower planting.…”
Section: Model Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were reviewed by Kool et al [ 14 ] and classified into two categories: models and measurements. The commonly used models were the Shuttleworth–Wallace model [ 19 ] and its improved structures [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], the clumped model [ 26 , 27 ], the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient model [ 28 , 29 , 30 ] and other improved dual-source models [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], while measurements were mainly eddy covariance techniques [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] and Bowen ratio systems [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] (acquiring ET), stable isotopes [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ] (acquiring E s or T ), sap flow meters [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ] (acquiring T ), microlysimeters [ 50 , 51 , 52 ] (acquiring E s ) and water collection tanks [ 53 , 54 ] (acquiring E i ). Among these methods, the modeling approach has the advantage of its applicability over a wide range of time scales and can be applied to the spatial scale of an entire ecosystem [ 55 , 56 ], but these models always require complex parameterizations and still require validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%