1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48817-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating and Choosing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the theoretical covariance of the fields (σ or ε) is not available, the integral range can be estimated according to the procedure proposed by Georges Matheron for any random function (30): working with realizations of Z(x) on domains B with an increasing volume V (or in the present case considering subdomains of large simulations, with a wide range of sizes), we can estimate the parameter A 3 by fitting the obtained variance according to the expression (9.2). The point variance D 2 Z of the corresponding field is directly estimated from the experimental variance of the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the theoretical covariance of the fields (σ or ε) is not available, the integral range can be estimated according to the procedure proposed by Georges Matheron for any random function (30): working with realizations of Z(x) on domains B with an increasing volume V (or in the present case considering subdomains of large simulations, with a wide range of sizes), we can estimate the parameter A 3 by fitting the obtained variance according to the expression (9.2). The point variance D 2 Z of the corresponding field is directly estimated from the experimental variance of the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the theoretical covariance of the fields (σ or ε) is not available, the integral range can be estimated according to the procedure proposed by Georges Matheron for any random function (19): working with realizations of Z(x) on domains B with an increasing volume V (or in the present case considering subdomains of large simulations, with a wide range of sizes), we can estimate the parameter A 3 by fitting the obtained variance according to the expression (12). The point variance D 2 Z of the corresponding field is directly estimated from the experimental variance of the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wider classes of problems can be formed, e.g. by non-linear transformation of variables (as in generalized linear models, McCullagh and Nelder, 1989), or by defining linear relations locally (approximating more complex relations with local linear models, as in generalized additive models, Hastie and Tibshirani, 1990).Linear models are a means of expressing real-life problems in a mathematical form, and are therefore helpful in the abstraction of problems and in communication. Comprehensive treatments of linear models are found in Rao (1973), Searle (1971), Christensen (1987, and in Draper and Smith (1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore local estimation only calls for variogram values at distances that allow a meaningful estimation of the variogram (i.e. values at distances less than approximately half the dimensions of the area used for variogram calculation, Journel and Huijbregts, 1978, III.B.7;Matheron, 1989) and that are less affected by biased estimation of the trend parameters ¥ (Cressie and Zimmerman, 1992). In practice V and v 0 are not known but estimated withV andv 0 from sample data, causinĝ (Harville, 1985, Christensen, 1991.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%