2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110805
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating aerosol transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 in New York City public schools during reopening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Data for the conditional infection probabilities shown in the plot are provided in a table in the supplemental information. We have included a dashed line at a conditional probability of 0.001 on the plot for reference, this value was suggested in the recent publication of Buonanno et al (Buonanno et al, 2020a) The probabilities predicted here align well with those estimated in other works for conditional infection probabilities in similar classroom spaces when accounting for differences in exposure duration between the studies (Pavilonis et al, 2021;Shen et al, 2021;Stabile et al, 2021). For example, Plavilonis et al (Pavilonis et al, 2021) found estimated mean conditional infection probabilites of 0.35 (35%)…”
Section: Results For Specific Interventionssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data for the conditional infection probabilities shown in the plot are provided in a table in the supplemental information. We have included a dashed line at a conditional probability of 0.001 on the plot for reference, this value was suggested in the recent publication of Buonanno et al (Buonanno et al, 2020a) The probabilities predicted here align well with those estimated in other works for conditional infection probabilities in similar classroom spaces when accounting for differences in exposure duration between the studies (Pavilonis et al, 2021;Shen et al, 2021;Stabile et al, 2021). For example, Plavilonis et al (Pavilonis et al, 2021) found estimated mean conditional infection probabilites of 0.35 (35%)…”
Section: Results For Specific Interventionssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The Wells-Riley model has also been used to study SARS-CoV-2 transmission in classrooms, for examples see (Foster and Kinzel, 2021;Pavilonis et al, 2021;Shen et al, 2021 et al, 2021) used a Wells-Riley model to estimate the aerosol transmission risk in New York City public schools for different exposure scenarios and found mean transmission probabilities (for all rooms considered) between 0.043 and 0.37, with the highest probabilities corresponding to transmission from teacher to students (neither wearing masks) for an exposure duration of 6.3 hr. The Wells-Riley model was also used to look at the impact of air changes per hour (Stabile et al, 2021;Shen et al, 2021) and other interventions (Shen et al, 2021;Zhang, 2020) on transmission risk in classrooms for different scenarios.…”
Section: Wells-riley Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such schools, a potential approach to monitor and minimize the virus spread in indoor environments could be the use of a proxy providing real-time information on the virus concentration indoors then suggesting to apply manual ventilation procedures accordingly. Exhaled CO 2 has been proposed as a possible proxy for virus transmission indoors as it is a commonly used indicator of the ventilation rate and, more generally, indoor air quality [ [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] ]. While in principle exhaled CO 2 could be a good proxy for indoor-generated gaseous pollutants (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies propose the occupants' exhaled CO2 as a possible proxy for virus spreading in an indoor environment [12]. Still, this approach could be considered an oversimplified way to cope with the problem of the virus spread in indoor environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%