2006
DOI: 10.4141/s05-063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating actual evapotranspiration using water budget and soil water reduction methods

Abstract: Studies on estimation of actual evapotranspiration on disturbed lands are scarce and yet such data are essential in hydrologic modeling. Our study compared the variability of estimates of actual evapotranspiration (AET) from a reclaimed site in northern Alberta using the simplified water budget (WB) and soil water reduction (SWR) methods. The AET estimates from the simplified water budget equation (AET1) required field soil water content, precipitation and runoff. The AET estimates from the soil water reductio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various modelling approaches have been used for estimation of evapotranspiration at regional scales (Ray & Dadhwal, 2001;Consoli et al, 2006;Tasumi & Allen, 2007). There are direct and indirect methods for evapotranspiration estimation (Chanasyk et al, 2006). Indirect methods include those based on the concept of actual evapotranspiration versus potential evapotranspiration and utilize meteorological data (Sharma, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various modelling approaches have been used for estimation of evapotranspiration at regional scales (Ray & Dadhwal, 2001;Consoli et al, 2006;Tasumi & Allen, 2007). There are direct and indirect methods for evapotranspiration estimation (Chanasyk et al, 2006). Indirect methods include those based on the concept of actual evapotranspiration versus potential evapotranspiration and utilize meteorological data (Sharma, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic components of both surface and groundwater runoff were obtained from a hydrograph of daily water flows by using the Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data algorithm (Magnuszewski, 1990;Tomaszewski, 2001). The amount of evapotranspiration (runoff deficit) was established by calculating the difference between the sides of a water balance equation, that is, a method which is well known in the literature (Soczyn ´ska, 1997;Byczkowski, 1999;Pociask-Karteczka, 2003;Chanasyk et al, 2006;Narasimhan, 2008;Lee et al, 2009;Scott, 2010). Retention was computed based on daily water stages in the studied lakes, which were converted to volume, as a difference between the beginning and end of the balance period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water fluxes include both incoming ones such as rainfall and supplementary irrigation (SI) and outgoing fluxes such as surface runoff (RO) and deep percolation (DP). The deep percolation losses depend on soil hydraulic properties (Ben-Asher & Ayars, 1990;Pereira et al, 2009) and are the hardest component to determine and are often neglected in similar studies (Chanasyk et al, 2006;Singh et al, 2017). The ET estimation using this method is similar to the one of the lysimeter method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%