2013 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/whispers.2013.8080639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating abundance fractions of materials in hyperspectral images by fitting a post-nonlinear mixing model

Abstract: Within the area of hyperspectral data processing, nonlinear unmixing techniques have emerged as promising alternatives for overcoming the limitations of linear methods. In this paper, we consider the class of post-nonlinear mixing models of the partially linear form. More precisely, these composite models consist of a linear mixing part and a nonlinear fluctuation term defined in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, both terms being parameterized by the endmember spectral signatures and their respective abundan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In hyperspectral images, a pixel is usually a spectral mixture of several spectral signatures of pure materials, termed endmembers, due to limited spatial resolution of devices and diversity of materials [58]. Although nonlinear mixture models have begun to support novel applications [59]- [61], the linear mixture model is still widely used for determining and quantifying materials in sensed images due to its simpler physical interpretation. With the linear mixture model, pixels can be decomposed as linear combinations of constituent spectra, weighted by fractions of abundance.…”
Section: Distributed Unmixing Of Hyperspectral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hyperspectral images, a pixel is usually a spectral mixture of several spectral signatures of pure materials, termed endmembers, due to limited spatial resolution of devices and diversity of materials [58]. Although nonlinear mixture models have begun to support novel applications [59]- [61], the linear mixture model is still widely used for determining and quantifying materials in sensed images due to its simpler physical interpretation. With the linear mixture model, pixels can be decomposed as linear combinations of constituent spectra, weighted by fractions of abundance.…”
Section: Distributed Unmixing Of Hyperspectral Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was proposed in [21]. In [22] [23], the term ψ nlin is also called the residual term and the associated algorithm is called the residual component analysis.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Interpreting results with intuitive observation: When testing unmixing algorithms with real data, most of the existing works [12], [20], [21], [25]- [29] illustrate the results in a straightforward manner by showing the estimated abundance maps and making visually intuitive comparisons. Clearly, this qualitative method is not very helpful to understand the performance of these algorithms.…”
Section: B Evaluation Of the Unmixing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sensitivity to outliers is due to the investigated ℓ 2 -norm as a cost function in the FCLS and SUnSAL algorithms, as well as all unmixing algorithms that explore least-squares solutions. It is worth noting that nonlinear unmixing algorithms also suffer from this drawback, including the kernel-based fully-constrained least-squares (KFCLS) [15], nonlinear fluctuation methods [7] and post-nonlinear methods [16].Information theoretic learning provides an elegant alternative to the conventional minimization of the ℓ 2 -norm in least-squares…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…decrease σ = σ 0 /p, and go to line 2 13: else 14: increase σ = 1.2σ, and go to line 2 15: end if 16: end if 13 V. EXPERIMENTS WITH SYNTHETIC DATA In this section, the performance of the proposed fully-constrained (CUSAL-FC) and sparsity-promoting (CUSAL-SP) algorithms is evaluated on synthetic data. A comparative study is performed considering six state-of-the-art methods proposed for linear and nonlinear unmixing models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%