2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14020471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating a Stoichiometric Solid’s Gibbs Free Energy Model by Means of a Constrained Evolutionary Strategy

Abstract: Modeling of thermodynamic properties, like heat capacities for stoichiometric solids, includes the treatment of different sources of data which may be inconsistent and diverse. In this work, an approach based on the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) is proposed and described as an alternative method for data treatment and fitting with the support of data source dependent weight factors and physical constraints. This is applied to a Gibb’s Free Energy stoichiometric model for different ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means, experimental data have been excluded from the fit if the state point at which the viscosity is given is out of the range of validity of the equation of state, if the equation of state predicts the viscosity in a different phase as given by the experimental data point, and if the experimental viscosity deviates more than 30% from a preliminary model. For fitting, a modification of the algorithm described by Grau Turuelo et al 462 has been used, which utilizes the covariance matrix evolutionary strategy by Hansen and Ostermeier 463 as implemented in the DEAP evolutionary computational framework freely available for the programming language python. 464 Multiparameter equations of state, the PR, and the LKP have been used to refit the fluid-specific scaling factors ξ of eq 10 when using the global parameters listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Adjustment Of Fluid-specific Scaling Factors ξmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means, experimental data have been excluded from the fit if the state point at which the viscosity is given is out of the range of validity of the equation of state, if the equation of state predicts the viscosity in a different phase as given by the experimental data point, and if the experimental viscosity deviates more than 30% from a preliminary model. For fitting, a modification of the algorithm described by Grau Turuelo et al 462 has been used, which utilizes the covariance matrix evolutionary strategy by Hansen and Ostermeier 463 as implemented in the DEAP evolutionary computational framework freely available for the programming language python. 464 Multiparameter equations of state, the PR, and the LKP have been used to refit the fluid-specific scaling factors ξ of eq 10 when using the global parameters listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Adjustment Of Fluid-specific Scaling Factors ξmentioning
confidence: 99%