2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.05209
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating a Brain Network Predictive of Stress and Genotype with Supervised Autoencoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Derivations of analytic solutions can be referenced in Appendix A. Further discussion on the properties of these factor models can be found in [23] and [24].…”
Section: Augmentedpca Factor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivations of analytic solutions can be referenced in Appendix A. Further discussion on the properties of these factor models can be found in [23] and [24].…”
Section: Augmentedpca Factor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the prior distribution of the latent factors and the conditional distributions have been defined, statistical estimation is straightforward by maximum likelihood or Bayesian methods [27]. However, it has been demonstrated that joint models suffer under model misspecification, particularly when the number of learned factors is less than the true latent dimensionality [23,28]. Furthermore, the variance of the outcomes is often small relative to the variance of the observations, which leads to the outcome being poorly characterized [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address some of these limitations, SAEs can be used to effectively approximate traditional factor models while including a predictive term. SAEs have been shown to ameliorate some concerns about model misspecficiation [28]. SAEs have been shown to give gains in many predictive applications [18,16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations