2017
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Water-Column Nutrient Concentrations and Carbonate System Parameters in the Global Ocean: A Novel Approach Based on Neural Networks

Abstract: A neural network-based method (CANYON: CArbonate system and Nutrients concentration from hYdrological properties and Oxygen using a Neural-network) was developed to estimate water-column (i.e., from surface to 8,000 m depth) biogeochemically relevant variables in the Global Ocean. These are the concentrations of three nutrients [nitrate (NO 3 − ), phosphate (PO 4 3− ), and silicate (Si(OH) 4 )] and four carbonate system parameters [total alkalinity (A T ), dissolved inorganic carbon (C T ), pH (pH T ), and par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
93
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is modeled on the procedures used to adjust Argo salinity data [ Owens and Wong , ]. As an independent check on the correction process, the adjusted nitrate concentrations were also compared to the predictions of the CANYON neural network based system [ Sauzède et al ., ]. Mismatches between the MLR and CANYON estimates were generally less than 1 µmol kg −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process is modeled on the procedures used to adjust Argo salinity data [ Owens and Wong , ]. As an independent check on the correction process, the adjusted nitrate concentrations were also compared to the predictions of the CANYON neural network based system [ Sauzède et al ., ]. Mismatches between the MLR and CANYON estimates were generally less than 1 µmol kg −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corrections are validated over longer time periods by comparing the corrected data to estimations of neural network systems [ Sauzède et al ., ] and observations in the GLODAPv2 data set. The accuracy of the sensor data for nitrate and pH should not degrade appreciably in time because the correction process is the same as that used to make the initial corrections that produce the favorable comparison to independent deployment profiles (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there were no nitrate sensors on the floats, two depth values are derived as the proxy for the nitracline: (i) the 22 °C isotherm ( z T22 ) which was used by Zhang et al () as the proxy for nutricline and could be expected to covary with the depth where [NO] 3 reaches 0–5 μmol/kg in SCS based on a regional empirical relationship (Chen et al, ); and (ii) the depth which the neural‐network model CANYON finds [NO 3 ] = 2 μmol/kg ( z NO3 ; Sauzède et al, ). CANYON estimates [NO 3 ] based on the date, location, temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbols Used in This StudyChen et al, 2006); and (ii) the depth which the neural-network model CANYON finds [NO 3 ] = 2 μmol/kg (z NO3 ;Sauzède et al, 2017). CANYON estimates [NO 3 ] based on the date, location, temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLR equations are derived from laboratory measurements on water samples collected throughout the Southern Ocean [ Williams et al ., ]. The adjustments are verified by comparing the corrected data estimates generated from a neural network‐based procedure [ Sauzède et al ., ] and data from GLODAPv2 [ Olsen et al ., ]. The adjustment process produces a data set that matches samples collected at stations where floats are deployed to better than 1 µmol kg −1 throughout the water column [ Johnson et al ., ].…”
Section: Data Sources and Quality Control Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%