2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of suspended sediment entering San Francisco Bay from the Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta, San Francisco Bay, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sediment budgets within the Bay suggest that it is becoming a net sediment exporting system due to anthropogenic changes in sediment delivery processes within the watershed (Geen & Luoma, 1999;Jafee et al, 1998;McKee et al, 2006). further offshore than the current study area, upwelling currents and lateral transport of fine-grained material is possible during disposal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Sediment budgets within the Bay suggest that it is becoming a net sediment exporting system due to anthropogenic changes in sediment delivery processes within the watershed (Geen & Luoma, 1999;Jafee et al, 1998;McKee et al, 2006). further offshore than the current study area, upwelling currents and lateral transport of fine-grained material is possible during disposal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Apart from the intrayearly seasonality, the Delta experiences inter-annual variability with wetter (e.g., 2011) and drier years (e.g., 2013). During the wet season, the Sacramento River pulse increases SSC and exports sediment towards the Bay, affecting biota behavior McKee et al 2006McKee et al , 2013. On average, the Delta stores roughly two-thirds of the sediment input for both wet and dry years (Wright and Schoellhamer 2005;Marineau and Wright 2014;Achete et al 2015).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined suspended sediment trends from the greater Sacramento River Basin [4,16,38], though none have examined trends between the Sacramento River below Keswick to Verona (Figure 1) due to a lack of measured data. Statistically significant decreasing trends of modeled sediment were found at the Sacramento River at the Butte City gage (reach 49, p = 0.01, 0.02 ρ and τ, respectively) and at the Sacramento River at the Colusa gage (reach 61, p = 0.03, 0.04, ρ and τ, respectively) for the lower 50% flow regime.…”
Section: Historical Trends In Streamflow and Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%