2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of repeatability for selection of genotypes of seedless table grapes for Brazilian semiarid regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superiority of the temporary environmental variance (V te ) in relation to the permanent phenotypic variance estimated between plants (V pp ) (Table 2) indicate that these characteristics are highly influenced by environmental conditions. Results similar to these were reported by Carvalho et al (2023) for yield, number of bunches, bunch traits, soluble solids content, titratable acidity and ratio; Sanchéz et al (2017) for fruit production; and Sales et al (2019) for all the variables evaluated by them (yield, bunch weight, soluble solids content, and ratio), with the exception of the number of bunches, in which the V pp values were greater than the V te values. In contrast, Leão et al (2018) detected higher V pp…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The superiority of the temporary environmental variance (V te ) in relation to the permanent phenotypic variance estimated between plants (V pp ) (Table 2) indicate that these characteristics are highly influenced by environmental conditions. Results similar to these were reported by Carvalho et al (2023) for yield, number of bunches, bunch traits, soluble solids content, titratable acidity and ratio; Sanchéz et al (2017) for fruit production; and Sales et al (2019) for all the variables evaluated by them (yield, bunch weight, soluble solids content, and ratio), with the exception of the number of bunches, in which the V pp values were greater than the V te values. In contrast, Leão et al (2018) detected higher V pp…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…(2017) for fruit production; and Sales et al. (2019) for all the variables evaluated by them (yield, bunch weight, soluble solids content, and ratio ), with the exception of the number of bunches, in which the V pp values were greater than the V te values. In contrast, Leão et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences obtained in this study between Vpp and Vte are probably related to the genetic structure of populations as well as the biotic and abiotic environmental effects that act on them. Similar results of greater phenotypic than environmental variation were observed for fruit traits in other perennial species, e.g., acerola (Malpighia emarginata), mango (Mangifera indica L.), sweet orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck), peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch), and grapevine (Vitis vinifera) (Lopes et al 2001;Costa 2003;Negreiros et al 2008;Bruna et al 2012;Da Silva Sales et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…REML/BLUP analyses have been increasingly used in plant breeding, especially with perennial crops. From this perspective, many studies have been carried out to improve forest species, e.g., rubber (Kalil et al 2000) and eucalyptus (Rocha et al 2006), species that produce essential stimulant foods, e.g., coffee (Petek et al 2008), and various fruit species, including acerola (Paiva et al 2002), cupuaçu (Alves and Resende 2008), papaya (Oliveira et al 2012), açaí (Teixeira et al 2012, passion fruit (Santos et al 2015), mango (Arriel et al 2016), guava (Dos Santos et al 2017), soursop (Sanchéz et al 2017), and grapevine ( Da Silva Sales et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%