2005
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2005.909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Parameters for Genetic Relationship between Reproductive Performances and Body Condition Score of Hanwoo Cows

Abstract: This study was conducted to estimate phenotypic and genetic parameters of body condition score (BCS) and reproductive traits in Hanwoo cows. DFREML procedures were applied to obtain variance-covariance components and heritability estimates with single or two-trait models. Estimates of phenotypic correlations of BCS at service with BCS at calving was 0.16 and 0.26 with calving interval, 0.08 with gestation length, and 0.06 with number of services per conception, respectively. Estimates of phenotypic correlation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
8
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
8
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed direct and maternal heritability estimates for BW of 0.22 ± 0.02 ( Table 3 ) and 0.12 ± 0.01, respectively, were comparable to 0.20 and 0.09 obtained by Choi et al [ 15 ] in Hanwoo calves using a model similar to this study, except only for a non-zero covariance assumption between the additive genetic and maternal effects. Contrastingly, numerous researchers including Kars et al [ 16 ] (0.41, Nguni cattle stud), Mujibi et al [ 17 ] (0.46, Charolais), Martínez-González et al [ 18 ] (0.59, Nellore), and Tawah et al [ 19 ] (0.39, Gudali; 0.65, Wakwa Cattle) reported higher direct heritability estimates compared with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The observed direct and maternal heritability estimates for BW of 0.22 ± 0.02 ( Table 3 ) and 0.12 ± 0.01, respectively, were comparable to 0.20 and 0.09 obtained by Choi et al [ 15 ] in Hanwoo calves using a model similar to this study, except only for a non-zero covariance assumption between the additive genetic and maternal effects. Contrastingly, numerous researchers including Kars et al [ 16 ] (0.41, Nguni cattle stud), Mujibi et al [ 17 ] (0.46, Charolais), Martínez-González et al [ 18 ] (0.59, Nellore), and Tawah et al [ 19 ] (0.39, Gudali; 0.65, Wakwa Cattle) reported higher direct heritability estimates compared with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(2004) have reported 0.31 for Chinese Simmental cattle at 3 months of age, which is slightly higher than the estimate in the present study at 4‐mo. In our study, the estimated maternal heritabilities for body weight at 0‐mo and 4‐mo (0.33 ± 0.07 and 0.33 ± 0.06, respectively) were higher than the estimate of 0.09 and 0.14 at birth and 0.06 and 0.05 at weaning reported by Choi et al . (2005) and Intaratham et al .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…In our study, the estimated maternal heritabilities for body weight at 0-mo and 4-mo (0.33 Ϯ 0.07 and 0.33 Ϯ 0.06, respectively) were higher than the estimate of 0.09 and 0.14 at birth and 0.06 and 0.05 at weaning reported by Choi et al (2005) and Intaratham et al (2008), respectively, indicating that milking ability of cows and suckling performance of calves are also responsible at different ages for these traits. The estimates of direct ¥ maternal genetic correlations were close to zero for most of the traits, negative and high for CD (-0.86 Ϯ 0.13) and PBW (-0.77 Ϯ 0.12) at 0-mo and negative and moderate for RL (-0.48 Ϯ 0.26) at 4-mo.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations