2017
DOI: 10.1080/00167223.2017.1316212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated travel time for walking trails in natural areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the distance or closeness of these elements was calculated, and on the other, the travel time on foot from some of them, thereby introducing the capacity of human penetration in forestland. Regarding the latter, it must be borne in mind that the slope gradient influences movement on foot; the flatter the surface, the greater the distance travelled in a given time [56,57]. Naturally, travel times and distances were only calculated for those elements from which people can make incursions into the forest environment, such as the cases of paths, roads without shoulders, recreation areas, lookout points, population centres and scattered rural buildings.…”
Section: Obtaining Induced Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the distance or closeness of these elements was calculated, and on the other, the travel time on foot from some of them, thereby introducing the capacity of human penetration in forestland. Regarding the latter, it must be borne in mind that the slope gradient influences movement on foot; the flatter the surface, the greater the distance travelled in a given time [56,57]. Naturally, travel times and distances were only calculated for those elements from which people can make incursions into the forest environment, such as the cases of paths, roads without shoulders, recreation areas, lookout points, population centres and scattered rural buildings.…”
Section: Obtaining Induced Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por esta razón aquí se optó por emplear Arcgis y su algoritmo CostDistance que, a pesar de ser isotrópico, proporcionaba resultados más fáciles de entender. Dado que las vías romanas eran utilizadas en ambos sentidos, y que la diferencia altimétrica entre canteras y puertos no superaba los 450 metros en los más de 40 km que los separan -pendiente del 1%-no interesó tanto la anisotropía de la pendiente como calcular, una vez establecida la ruta óptima, el tiempo que podía tardar en recorrerse en ambos sentidos, considerando, ahora sí, la anisotropía; para ello fue empleada la función Modified Hiking Function (Márquez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…
Fig. 13.Comparing the traditional route between Ampelakia and Spilia with the results of four different least cost path analyses: ‘Tobler's Hiking Function’ (after Tripcevich 2009 and White 2015), the modified ‘Tobler's Hiking Function’ (after Márquez-Pérez, Vallejo-Villalta and Álvarez-Francoso 2017) and the energy cost function (after Minetti et al 2002).
Fig.
…”
Section: Experience: Approaching the Cavementioning
confidence: 99%