1983
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(83)90078-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated dose to man from uranium millling via the beef/milk food-chain pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence exists that uranium mining activities can result in increased radionuclide uptake in humans via consumption of milk and cattle grazing near contaminated mining/milling facilities [17,18]. Further evidence suggests that living around hazardous waste sites that contain long‐lived radionuclides may result in greater risk for the development of certain types of cancer [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence exists that uranium mining activities can result in increased radionuclide uptake in humans via consumption of milk and cattle grazing near contaminated mining/milling facilities [17,18]. Further evidence suggests that living around hazardous waste sites that contain long‐lived radionuclides may result in greater risk for the development of certain types of cancer [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ng et al (1977) recommend an F m value of 2.6 Â 10 À4 d L À1 based on six balance studies of linked milk and vegetation with a range in F m value of 1.3 Â 10 À5 -7.7 Â 10 À4 d L À1 for stable Pb (assuming 10 kg d À1 (DW) intake) and two radioisotope studies which resulted in values for F m of 2.4 Â 10 À5 and 9.1 Â 10 À6 d L À1 . Rayno (1983) reported ranges in F m value of 2.0 Â 10 À6 e1.2 Â 10 À4 d L À1 based on five studies; McDowell-Boyer et al (1980) reported a mean F m value of 1.0 Â 10 À4 d L À1 based on 14 values, ranging from 2.0 Â 10 À6 to 4 Â 10 À4 d L À1 ; and Watson (1983) reported a mean F m of 1.2 Â 10 À4 d L À1 based on five studies which ranged from 1.8 Â 10 À6 to 4.0 Â 10 À4 d L À1 .…”
Section: Natural Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When they fed contaminated hay, the F m value for skimmed milk was 4.0 Â 10 À4 e7.0 Â 10 À4 d L À1 at 8e13 days after dosing commenced (Kirchman et al, 1972). Values given in various reviews (Rayno, 1983;McDowellBoyer et al, 1980;Ng et al, 1977) are generally at, or close to, 4.0 Â 10 À4 d L À1 and nearly all rely largely on Sansom and Garner (1966) or Kirchman et al (1972). The model proposed in Morgan and Beetham (1990) suggests an F m value of 1.3 Â 10 À3 d L À1 , which is above the range reported above.…”
Section: Natural Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer of 226 Ra, 228 Ra and 210 Pb in the soilforage-milk-plant system is one of the main internal exposure routes in man, due to the consumption of milk and dairy products [27].…”
Section: Natural Radionuclides In the Human Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%