2001
DOI: 10.3133/ofr01487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated depth to water, North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of 1 m soil depths throughout the SE U.S. simulation domain is further supported by the presence of an impermeable layer of saprolite around 1 m of depth in the Piedmont [ Amoozegar et al , ]. In the Coastal Plain, soils are deeper and infiltration rates can be much higher than in the Piedmont, but the unconfined water table is shallow and soils are generally wet with precipitation exceeding evapotranspiration most of the year [ Eimers et al , ; Markewich et al, ]. The model soil layers include a superficial layer and two deeper layers in the rooting zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of 1 m soil depths throughout the SE U.S. simulation domain is further supported by the presence of an impermeable layer of saprolite around 1 m of depth in the Piedmont [ Amoozegar et al , ]. In the Coastal Plain, soils are deeper and infiltration rates can be much higher than in the Piedmont, but the unconfined water table is shallow and soils are generally wet with precipitation exceeding evapotranspiration most of the year [ Eimers et al , ; Markewich et al, ]. The model soil layers include a superficial layer and two deeper layers in the rooting zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%