2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated confidence interval from single blood pressure measurement based on algorithmic fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, the mean age of 85 subjects was 40.4, the standard deviation was 15.2 and there were six people under 19 in all subjects. A wrist-mounted blood pressure device was used to obtain five sets of oscillometric BP measurements using a piezoelectric sensor embedded in a pressure cuff from each subject following the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) protocol [16,20]. The average value measured by the two trained observers was used as the reference value for SBP and DBP [14].…”
Section: Bp Measurement and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly, the mean age of 85 subjects was 40.4, the standard deviation was 15.2 and there were six people under 19 in all subjects. A wrist-mounted blood pressure device was used to obtain five sets of oscillometric BP measurements using a piezoelectric sensor embedded in a pressure cuff from each subject following the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) protocol [16,20]. The average value measured by the two trained observers was used as the reference value for SBP and DBP [14].…”
Section: Bp Measurement and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we assume that D * is a probability distribution for an artificial feature (µ * 1 , ..., µ * B ), where B denotes the size of replication. We measure the homogeneity between the Gaussian distribution hypothesis and the distribution of artificial features [20]. If the Lilliefors test returns a decision value for the null hypothesis then the artificial feature comes from a normal distribution family, against the alternative in which it does not come from such a distribution.…”
Section: Lilliefors Test For Artificial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we assume that D * is a probability distribution for an artificial feature ðη * 1 , ⋯, η * R Þ, where R denotes the size of replication. We measure the homogeneity between the Gaussian distribution hypothesis and the distribution of artificial features [18]. If the Lilliefors test returns a decision value for the null hypothesis, then the artificial feature comes from a normal distribution family, against the alternative that it does not come from such a distribution utilizing a Lilliefors test function.…”
Section: The Goodness Of Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BP data were measured from 85 people who do not have cardiovascular disease, from ages 12 to 80 years old with 48 men and 37 women. A wrist-mounted blood pressure device was used to measure 5 sets of oscillometric measurement BP from each subject on ANSI/AAMI protocol criteria [11,18]. The average value measured by the two experts was used as the reference value for SBP and DBP [9].…”
Section: Bp Measurements and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike DBN [13], each unit in the middle layer of the DBM acquires signal up and down to prevent uncertainty at the inference step [12]. More recently, the concepts of fusion and ensemble were employed in BP estimation to increase the performance of BP measurements [15][16][17]. DS fusion enables the evidence uncertainty to have upper and lower bounds that can be incorporated as a method for combined independent estimation of the observations, while also enabling the clear achievement and increased confidence in a given DBM estimate [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%