2020
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated age of first exposure to American football and outcome from concussion

Abstract: ObjectiveTo examine the association between estimated age of first exposure (eAFE) to American football and clinical measures throughout recovery following concussion.MethodsParticipants were recruited across 30 colleges and universities as part of the NCAA–DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium. There were 294 NCAA American football players (age = 19 ± 1 years) evaluated 24–48 hours following concussion with valid baseline data and 327 (age = 19 ± 1 years) evaluated at the time th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four ( 9 11 , 20 ) of the nine studies reported no association between age of first exposure to football and later-in-life brain health problems. Moreover, in all studies of current high school and collegiate athletes, earlier age of first exposure to contact and collision sports has not been associated with worse neurocognitive functioning, subjectively-experienced symptoms, or postural control during preseason baseline testing ( 12 16 , 18 , 19 ), or worse clinical outcome following concussion ( 17 ). Considering the literature more broadly, separate from the issue of age of first exposure to football, results from 7 studies ( 33 38 ) 2 have observed that men who played high school football are not at increased risk for later-in-life neurodegenerative disease ( 36 , 37 ), and they do not report greater mental health problems in their 20s ( 33 , 34 ), during middle age 2 , or during older adulthood ( 35 , 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four ( 9 11 , 20 ) of the nine studies reported no association between age of first exposure to football and later-in-life brain health problems. Moreover, in all studies of current high school and collegiate athletes, earlier age of first exposure to contact and collision sports has not been associated with worse neurocognitive functioning, subjectively-experienced symptoms, or postural control during preseason baseline testing ( 12 16 , 18 , 19 ), or worse clinical outcome following concussion ( 17 ). Considering the literature more broadly, separate from the issue of age of first exposure to football, results from 7 studies ( 33 38 ) 2 have observed that men who played high school football are not at increased risk for later-in-life neurodegenerative disease ( 36 , 37 ), and they do not report greater mental health problems in their 20s ( 33 , 34 ), during middle age 2 , or during older adulthood ( 35 , 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With time, other research groups have independently conducted 11 studies using diverse samples and methodologies, with none observing an association between earlier age of first exposure to football (or other contact and collision sports) and worse clinical or brain imaging outcomes (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). In current high school and collegiate athletes, age of first exposure was not associated with objectively measured neurocognitive functioning, subjectively-experienced symptoms, or postural control across seven highly-powered, observational studies (12-16, 18, 19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, if there is an association between earlier AFE and worse mental health or cognitive functioning, that association might emerge in association with aging. Nonetheless, the best available evidence suggests that, in current high school and collegiate athletes, earlier AFE to contact/collision sport is not associated with lower cognitive abilities on objective testing at baseline ( 84 , 87 , 88 , 90 , 123 ), greater physical, cognitive, or emotional symptom reporting at baseline ( 84 , 88 ), or worse clinical outcome following concussion ( 89 ).…”
Section: Studies With Current Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without an available pre-registered protocol detailing study outcomes and statistical analysis plans prior to data collection, it was/is not possible to determine selective outcome reporting and selective analytical reporting. One study (5%) was judged to be at high risk of bias due to a perceived limitation in the statistical analysis ( 89 ), and one study (5%) was considered high risk of bias due to clear evidence that data for only a subset of analyses was fully reported, and that the fully reported results were selected based on the (statistically significant) nature of the results ( 122 ).…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessment Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%