2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate of the reactivity of the VENUS-F subcritical configuration using a Monte Carlo MSM method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For measurements of reactivity effects, either the compensation method [29] or the MSM method [30] are used. Both require the application of the delayed neutron parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measurements of reactivity effects, either the compensation method [29] or the MSM method [30] are used. Both require the application of the delayed neutron parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADS experimental facilities are being prepared for the investigations of nuclear transmutation of MA and LLFP, as are the Transmutation Experimental Facility (TEF) [6] at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency and the Multi-purpose Hybrid Research Reactor for High-tech Applications (MYRRHA) [7] at SCK/CEN in Belgium. Research activities on ADS involved mainly the experimental feasibility study using critical assemblies and test facilities: MASURCA in France [8][9][10], YALINA-booster and-thermal in Belarus [11][12][13], VENUS-F in Belgium [14][15][16][17], and KUCA in Japan . At these facilities, feasibility studies on ADS have been conducted by combining a reactor core (fast or thermal core) with an external neutron source by the D-T accelerator (14 MeV neutrons) or 100 MeV proton accelerator (KUCA only), through experimental and numerical analyses of reactor physics parameters, including statics parameters: reaction rates, neutron spectrum, and subcritical multiplication factor; kinetics parameters: subcriticality, prompt neutron decay constant, effective delayed neutron fraction, and neutron generation time.…”
Section: Overview Of Research and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was measured using MSM method and mentioned CR position corresponds to criticality point achieved in the critical core configuration [7,8]. For other CR positions the reference values were obtained using MCNP simulation code to calculate reactivity difference to the reference point.…”
Section: The Sjöstrand Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%