2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-023-01488-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimate of soil heavy metal in a mining region using PCC-SVM-RFECV-AdaBoost combined with reflectance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest R 2 (0.884) was observed in the RLFD transformation. The smaller values of RMSE and MAE indicated that the estimation accuracy of the RFR model was high, and it had a high stability and generalization ability [33]. Overall, RFR based on RLFD (R 2 = 0.884, RMSE = 2.817%, MAE = 2.222) was the optimal estimation method for SOM content using the hyperspectral remote sensing data.…”
Section: Estimation Of Som Content With Rfrmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest R 2 (0.884) was observed in the RLFD transformation. The smaller values of RMSE and MAE indicated that the estimation accuracy of the RFR model was high, and it had a high stability and generalization ability [33]. Overall, RFR based on RLFD (R 2 = 0.884, RMSE = 2.817%, MAE = 2.222) was the optimal estimation method for SOM content using the hyperspectral remote sensing data.…”
Section: Estimation Of Som Content With Rfrmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…RMSE and MAE were used to represent the predictive capacity and the robustness of the hyperspectral inversion models. In general, lower RMSE and MAE indicate better model prediction accuracy [33]. The analytical expressions of R 2 , RMSE, and MAE are given below:…”
Section: Algorithm Assessment Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When RPD ≥ 2.0, the prediction model has a good prediction ability, when 1.4 ≤ RPD < 2.0, the model has the initial predictive capability, and when RPD < 1.4, the model has a poor predictive capability. In general, lower RMSE and MAE indicate better model prediction accuracy [26] .…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Currently, these feature selection algorithms have been effectively applied in various fields, especially the RFECV algorithm has been widely used in several fields. In the geological sciences field [27], it has been used for feature selection in soil heavy metal contamination data. In the electric load field [28,29], it has been used to select.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, among the three types of feature selection algorithms, Filter, Wrapper, and Embedded, the wrapped feature selection algorithm is widely used, especially the RFECV algorithm has become a hot application in the field of feature selection. In the field of geoscience, for the problem of soil heavy metal pollution, Yueyue Wang [27] et al used support vector machine recursive feature elimination cross-validation (SVM-RFECV) to select among pre-selected feature bands. In the field of electric load, Liang H [28] et al proposed a two-stage short-term load forecasting method based on the RFECV algorithm and time-convolutional network efficient channel attention mechanism-long and short-term memory network (TCN-ECA-LSTM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%