2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872015000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimadores de mezcla amerindia basados en métodos serológicos y moleculares

Abstract: (Rev Med Chile 2015; 143: 439-443)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to consider that MBL2 allele frequencies differ greatly between populations [ 48 , 49 ] being 42–46% for MBL2*B in Guarani Amerindians from south Brazil [ 31 ] and Chiriguano and Mapuche Indians from Argentina [ 50 ], and 11% for Euro-Brazilians from South Brazil [ 31 ], as those investigated in the present study. Thus, the high frequency of MBL2*B found in Chilean patients (48%) is probably due to high Amerindian admixture (52%, based on ancestry-informative markers [ 51 ]. The frequency of this allele was much lower in the present study (13% in patients and 15.6% in controls), in accordance with the very low Amerindian admixture (5%) of the investigated population [ 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to consider that MBL2 allele frequencies differ greatly between populations [ 48 , 49 ] being 42–46% for MBL2*B in Guarani Amerindians from south Brazil [ 31 ] and Chiriguano and Mapuche Indians from Argentina [ 50 ], and 11% for Euro-Brazilians from South Brazil [ 31 ], as those investigated in the present study. Thus, the high frequency of MBL2*B found in Chilean patients (48%) is probably due to high Amerindian admixture (52%, based on ancestry-informative markers [ 51 ]. The frequency of this allele was much lower in the present study (13% in patients and 15.6% in controls), in accordance with the very low Amerindian admixture (5%) of the investigated population [ 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%