1989
DOI: 10.3758/bf03334595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esthetic preference for rectangles of vertical and horizontal orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, no group-level preference was observed in the present data as to whether horizontally or vertically oriented arrangements were generally preferred. This ®nding converges with the results of Kubey and Barnett (1989), who did not ®nd any preference for an orientation of horizontally or vertically presented rectangles. Eysenck (1988) suggested solving the problem of objectivity of aesthetic judgments by using average judgments.…”
Section: Group Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, no group-level preference was observed in the present data as to whether horizontally or vertically oriented arrangements were generally preferred. This ®nding converges with the results of Kubey and Barnett (1989), who did not ®nd any preference for an orientation of horizontally or vertically presented rectangles. Eysenck (1988) suggested solving the problem of objectivity of aesthetic judgments by using average judgments.…”
Section: Group Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, details of results reported in the literature, such as huge error variances or null effects (e.g. Kubey & Barnett, 1989), for example, might also indicate individual differences. This, of course, may hold for certain types of stimuli, such as those mentioned in this paragraph, whereas it does not hold for others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%