2016
DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons

Abstract: Professional dental training can affect the esthetic judgement of smiles in individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A coincident midline is the most prevalent presentation in nature and must be respected in prosthetic dental treatment in order to ensure an aesthetic outcome [33,40]. Silva et al [7] found the threshold for perceiving a deviation of the maxillary interincisal midline with respect to the facial midline to be 2 mm, in coincidence with the observations of other authors [16,18]. Orthodontists are able to detect alterations of the maxillary interincisal midline with respect to the facial midline of as small as 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A coincident midline is the most prevalent presentation in nature and must be respected in prosthetic dental treatment in order to ensure an aesthetic outcome [33,40]. Silva et al [7] found the threshold for perceiving a deviation of the maxillary interincisal midline with respect to the facial midline to be 2 mm, in coincidence with the observations of other authors [16,18]. Orthodontists are able to detect alterations of the maxillary interincisal midline with respect to the facial midline of as small as 1 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Kokich et al reported that a variation between the facial line and the maxillary interincisal midline limited to 4 mm is not perceptible to either patients or dental professionals [15], though other authors consider that a smaller difference proves evident. This is the case of Sadrhaghighi et al [16], who recorded a deviation of the maxillary interincisal midline with respect to the facial midline of between 1 and 3 mm. Pinho et al [17] in turn found that orthodontists are able to detect any lack of coincidence of the two midlines, while prosthodontists detect no evident alterations until the difference reaches at least 2 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, even though statistical differences were found, clinical results and esthetical patterns were not affected by these findings. In our opinion, statistical results are strongly related to measurements collected in every single tooth; nevertheless, the esthetical feature is absolutely related to overall view of smile, [49][50][51] and therefore in our opinion minimal changes in proportions did not affect esthetical performances of rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Cracel-Nogueira et al determined that the medium smile was the most admired smile, while the high smile was deemed the least esthetically appealing 11 . Sadrhaghighi et al reported that education can affect the perception and assessment of smile components by observers 17 . In this study, the only question that had a statistically significant difference in responses before and after training was the smile or lip line question (p< no statistically significant difference in responses to the golden ratio question before and after training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that technical preparation and guidance will improve an individual's esthetic perception. Thus, it is necessary to further examine the outcome of undergraduate and postgraduate dental education about the standards of smile esthetics on the perception of beauty and esthetic judgement by clinicians 17 .…”
Section: Photo Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%