Esthetic outcome of single implant crowns following type 1 and type 3 implant placement: a systematic review

Shi, Junyu; Ren, Wei; Liu, Zhuang; Gu, Yun; Qiao, Shuqing

doi:10.1111/clr.12334

Cited by 20 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patient satisfaction, which was considered as one of the most important criteria for assessing clinical success, was also assessed in this study . Most patients (over 80%) in this study were satisfied with their restorations in form and color in both the ZC and HC groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Single Zirconia‐Based and High‐Noble Alloy Porcelain‐Fused‐to‐Metal Crowns in the Esthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Shi

Xin

et al. 2015

Journal of Prosthodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The results of the study showed that a high survival rate could be achieved in both ZC and HC groups. Chipping of the veneering porcelain was the most frequently seen event that led to short-term (less than 3 years) failure and complications. The patients' rating of ZC crowns was not superior to HC crowns. Well-designed studies with high evidence level and large sample size are still needed to further explore the clinical success of ZC and HC crowns.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Single Zirconia‐Based and High‐Noble Alloy Porcelain‐Fused‐to‐Metal Crowns in the Esthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Shi

Xin

et al. 2015

Journal of Prosthodontics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Frequency analysis which reflects the discrete distribution of data is important for ordinal data (Shi et al. ). In this study, the perfect rate at 2‐year follow‐up was almost thirteen times as much as it at baseline.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2‐year prospective study

Shi

Liu

et al. 2014

Clinical Oral Implants Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to the present prospective clinical study, it can be concluded that it is feasible to use tissue-level implant to support single crowns in esthetic area. Favorable short-term esthetic outcome and stability of soft tissue around single implant crowns can be expected in patients with or without graft. However, graft procedures might have an unfavorable effect on the esthetic outcome. Gingival biotype can be considered as prognostic factor for esthetic outcome. RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to provide evidence for the long-term stability of peri-implant soft tissue using tissue-level implant systems.

show abstract

“…In the current literature, the PES and the PES/WES are frequently used for esthetic evaluations of single implant crowns …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Esthetic Evaluation of Implant Crowns and Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla: Comparison and Reproducibility of Three Different Indices

Tettamanti

Millen²,

Gavric

et al. 2015

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background A successful implant reconstruction with optimal esthetics consists of a visually pleasing prosthesis and complete and healthy surrounding soft tissue. In the current literature, numerous indices used to qualitatively assess esthetics have been described. However, studies comparing the indices and their reproducibility are scarce. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare three different esthetic indices for the evaluation of single implant‐supported crowns. Materials and Methods A total of 10 prosthodontists (P), 10 orthodontists (O), 10 general dentists (G), and 10 lay people (L) independently performed the same assessment using 30 photographs and corresponding casts with three different esthetic indices (Peri‐Implant and Crown Index [PICI], Implant Crown Aesthetic Index [ICAI], “Pink Esthetic Score/White Esthetic Score [PES/WES]) and repeated the evaluations 4 weeks later. Results The PES/WES and the PICI showed significantly higher esthetic scores (pink, white, total) and clinical acceptance compared with the ICAI in all four groups and in both assessments. The highest intraobserver agreement was achieved using the PES/WES and the least with the ICAI. The mean Kappa per group ranged from 0.18 (group L with ICAI) to 0.63 (group G with PICI). Conclusion In comparison with the ICAI, the PES/WES and PICI were more reproducible. Therefore, PES/WES and PICI seem to be more suitable as esthetic indices for single implant crowns.

show abstract

Esthetic outcome of single implant crowns following type 1 and type 3 implant placement: a systematic review

Cited by 20 publications

References 66 publications

Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Single Zirconia‐Based and High‐Noble Alloy Porcelain‐Fused‐to‐Metal Crowns in the Esthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Single Zirconia‐Based and High‐Noble Alloy Porcelain‐Fused‐to‐Metal Crowns in the Esthetic Area: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2‐year prospective study

Esthetic Evaluation of Implant Crowns and Peri‐Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla: Comparison and Reproducibility of Three Different Indices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About