Esthetic Evaluation of Anterior Single‐Tooth Implants with Different Abutment Designs—Patients’ Satisfaction Compared to Dentists’ Observations

Patil, Ratnadeep; Gresnigt, Marco; Mahesh, Kavita; Dilbaghi, Anjali; Cune, Marco S.

doi:10.1111/jopr.12423

Cited by 10 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(18 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All eight indices investigated in the present study demonstrated poor correlations to subjective patient satisfaction, the most representative indices being PES, PES/WES, CEI, and IAS ( r s > 0.2). These findings compare well to results from literature reporting a low correlation ( r s = 0.3) between PES and patient VAS ratings (Patil, Gresnigt, Mahesh, Dilbaghi, & Cune, ). Despite the fact that in the linear model of patient satisfaction, several scores showed estimated coefficients significantly different from zero, the linear relationship of VAS and scores was weak indicated by a small R 2 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices—Comparative analysis of reliability and validity

Hof

Umar²,

Budas

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices—Comparative analysis of reliability and validity

Hof

Umar²,

Budas

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The common general finding regarding both groups was that all biological and esthetic outcomes were within the normal health limits, remained relatively stable. This could be related to the atraumatic conservative surgical approach a conclusion which agrees with Patil et al [28] who followed the same conservative surgical and meticulous prosthetic procedures that may preserve the soft and hard tissues from damage.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

Effect of Implant Abutment Venting on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Response . A Randomized Clinical Trial

Aboelfadl

Taha

2018

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of venting of implant abutment on the peri implant soft tissue response in cement retained restorations.Patients and methods: 14 titanium threaded implants were placed in 14 patients in the premolar maxillary area. 14 crowns were cemented over the abutments where 7 of the abutments were closed design while the other 7 were vented abutments.A three stage protocol was executed; surgical stage where the implants were placed followed by the prosthetic stage which included placement of abutments of two designs, CAD/CAM provisional crowns were then fabricated and cemented. In the follow-up stage; periodontal and soft tissue esthetic assessments were done at the time of provisional restoration placement (base line), then at 3months and 6months intervals.Results: Analysis of the results revealed that the effect of the abutment venting (vented and closed) on the peri-implant tissues was statistically insignificant between groups at baseline while significant at follow up intervals. Conclusion:Vented abutments showed better perimplant soft tissue results at follow up intervals. which seems to be strongly correlated to the less amount of excessive cement extruded in this group. Clinical significance:Vented abutments should be considered as an alternative to closed ones to decrease the amount of extruded cement for better perimplant outcomes.

show abstract

“… In the majority of the studies evaluations were usually made by the researchers in a nonstandardized way (). Moreover, patient's opinions were scored using different methods, including visual analog scales, Likert scales, dichotomous or multiple choice answers and other scales.…”

Section: Subjective Assessment Of Esthetics: Patient‐reported Outcomementioning

confidence: 99%

Esthetic evaluation and patient‐centered outcomes in single‐tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area

Stefanini¹,

Felice²,

Mazzotti³

et al. 2018

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Criteria for successful implants, in the rehabilitation of a single missing tooth in the esthetic area, should be determined by composite outcomes, including functional and esthetic aspects of soft tissues and the reconstruction, as well as patient-reported outcomes. This paper focuses on current methods in esthetic assessment and patient-centered/reported outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area. The relationship between subjective, patient-based esthetic evaluations and objective, professional-based esthetic evaluations is reviewed. In spite of increasing interest in the assessment of 'success' in implant dentistry, it is not yet possible to provide evidence-based conclusions because of the lack of consensus on a universal implant-supported crown esthetic index. There is also a need to standardize reporting of patient-centered outcomes in partially edentulous patients treated with implants.

show abstract

Esthetic Evaluation of Anterior Single‐Tooth Implants with Different Abutment Designs—Patients’ Satisfaction Compared to Dentists’ Observations

Abstract: Curved abutment design does not significantly impact crown or gingival esthetics as assessed by PES and VAS scored by dentists and patients, respectively.

Cited by 10 publications

References 8 publications

Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices—Comparative analysis of reliability and validity

Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices—Comparative analysis of reliability and validity

Effect of Implant Abutment Venting on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Response . A Randomized Clinical Trial

Esthetic evaluation and patient‐centered outcomes in single‐tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About