2007
DOI: 10.1002/ange.200702218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estersubstitutionen in α‐helicalen Coiled‐Coil‐Peptiden: Effekt der Eliminierung von Wasserstoffbrücken auf die Struktur von Proteinen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GnHCl‐dependent denaturation experiments have shown that the coiled‐coil structure of 1 t is less stable than that of 1 by 1.1 kcal mol −1 ,14 namely implying about 0.4 kcal mol −1 structure destabilization for each thioester bond. The relatively minor destabilizing effect is similar to that observed earlier for removing a solvent exposed hydrogen bond,7 and can be explained by water molecules solvation of the sulfur (and oxygen) atoms, which reduces repulsion between them and the K14 carbonyl oxygen lone pair 7…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…GnHCl‐dependent denaturation experiments have shown that the coiled‐coil structure of 1 t is less stable than that of 1 by 1.1 kcal mol −1 ,14 namely implying about 0.4 kcal mol −1 structure destabilization for each thioester bond. The relatively minor destabilizing effect is similar to that observed earlier for removing a solvent exposed hydrogen bond,7 and can be explained by water molecules solvation of the sulfur (and oxygen) atoms, which reduces repulsion between them and the K14 carbonyl oxygen lone pair 7…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…GnHCl-dependent denaturation experiments have shown that the coiled-coil structure of 1 t is less stable than that of 1 by 1.1 kcal mol À1 , [14] namely implying about 0.4 kcal mol À1 structure destabilization for each thioester bond. The relatively minor destabilizing effect is similar to that observed earlier for removing a solvent exposed hydrogen bond, [7] and can be explained by water molecules solvation of the sulfur (and oxygen) atoms, which reduces repulsion between them and the K14 carbonyl oxygen lone pair. [7] Figure 3 b shows that the thioester bond is solventexposed, but it is also engulfed by the side-chains of residues K15, X21 (X = aryl-modified Lys; Figure 1), and E22 of the same chain, and E20 from the opposing helix.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The relatively minor destabilizing effect is similar to that observed earlier for removing a solvent exposed hydrogen bond, [7] and can be explained by water molecules solvation of the sulfur (and oxygen) atoms, which reduces repulsion between them and the K14 carbonyl oxygen lone pair. [7] Figure 3 b shows that the thioester bond is solventexposed, but it is also engulfed by the side-chains of residues K15, X21 (X = aryl-modified Lys; Figure 1), and E22 of the same chain, and E20 from the opposing helix. The regular Figure S6.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation