2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of the 1st WHO International Standard for anti-EV71 serum (Human)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These aforementioned pseudovirus-based NtAbs quantification assays for HFMD associated enteroviruses could be used for evaluation of vaccine induced humoral immune response. Establishment of reference standards like antiserum standards for measuring vaccine-induced NtAb titers is also an important part for bioassay P. Chen et al Journal of Virological Methods 246 (2017) 21-26 development (Cooper et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2011). Furthermore, a new EV-A71 infection mouse model had been successfully established based on EV-A71 pseudovirus, which also showed impressive advantages in efficacy evaluation of EV-A71 vaccine .Thus, introduction of enteroviruse pseudoviruses (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aforementioned pseudovirus-based NtAbs quantification assays for HFMD associated enteroviruses could be used for evaluation of vaccine induced humoral immune response. Establishment of reference standards like antiserum standards for measuring vaccine-induced NtAb titers is also an important part for bioassay P. Chen et al Journal of Virological Methods 246 (2017) 21-26 development (Cooper et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2011). Furthermore, a new EV-A71 infection mouse model had been successfully established based on EV-A71 pseudovirus, which also showed impressive advantages in efficacy evaluation of EV-A71 vaccine .Thus, introduction of enteroviruse pseudoviruses (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have determined that internal standards provided by the WHO for various pathogens may be useful and should be used to compare results across laboratories and diagnostic methods to help establish correlates of protection for SARS-CoV-2 and other high-threat pathogens (Cooper et al, 2018 ; McDonald et al, 2018 ; Mattiuzzo et al, 2019 , 2020 ; Ciotti et al, 2021 ; Knezevic et al, 2022 ). For example, when assessing candidate reference materials for enterovirus serology, one study evaluating the interassay variability for both the raw neutralization titer and the calculated relative potencies found a marked decrease in interassay variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversion of results from different laboratory methods to a harmonized international unit reduces the interlaboratory/method variability (Cooper et al, 2018 ; McDonald et al, 2018 ; Mattiuzzo et al, 2019 , 2020 ; Ciotti et al, 2021 ; Knezevic et al, 2022 ). The WHO International Standards (ISs) are considered the highest quality materials to use for comparison between diagnostic methods using international units (Mattiuzzo et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hard to compare different serological studies using different serological assays and sampling methods. The first international standard sera for measuring EV-A71 neutralizing antibody titers has been established [29]. It would be desirable to collect sera from different countries using similar sampling methods to measure cross-reactive neutralizing antibody titers using similar neutralization assays incorporating the international standard serum and recent circulating EV-A71 viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%