2016
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for breast cancer CT protocols in radiation therapy

Abstract: This article provides the first reported DRL for breast cancer CT localization procedure in RT and can be used as a benchmark for comparison for other RT centres.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 2 centres indicated that they sometimes use IV contrast. For comparison with the study by Connor et al (2016), scanner mean values were also used to calculate equivalent reference values for breast CT planning scans (as given in Tables 3 and 6). The achievable (median) CTDI vol was 8.4 mGy (range 2.4 to 19.9 mGy), with a reference value (third quartile) of 12.5 mGy.…”
Section: Audit Of Uk Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Ct Scans and Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 2 centres indicated that they sometimes use IV contrast. For comparison with the study by Connor et al (2016), scanner mean values were also used to calculate equivalent reference values for breast CT planning scans (as given in Tables 3 and 6). The achievable (median) CTDI vol was 8.4 mGy (range 2.4 to 19.9 mGy), with a reference value (third quartile) of 12.5 mGy.…”
Section: Audit Of Uk Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Ct Scans and Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the sit u a tion is not much better for the diag nos tic DRLs also, some as sess ments have been performed over the past few years [10]. The re sults were com pared to the sel dom pub lished data in or der to com pare the clin i cal prac tices [3][4][5][6]. Two of the published val ues are the na tional DRL val ues and therefore cor re spond to the 75 th per cen tile of the col lected data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). A com par i son of me dian CTDIvol of the UH Rijeka with pub lished data [3][4][5][6] is pre sented in fig. 1.…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diagnostic DRLs exist in many countries and there is some literature investigating DRLs in RT thorax and breast imaging 11,12 but no attempts have been made to introduce dose audit in HN RT CT imaging. Different scanning volumes, protocols and image quality requirements between diagnostic and RT CT do not support the use of diagnostic imaging (DI) DRLs in RT practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%