2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of Indicatory Metals for Filterable and Condensable PM2.5 Emitted from Important Stationary Emission Sources

Abstract: This study investigated indicatory metals in the filterable (FPM2.5) and condensable (CPM) particulate matter emitted from six different types of stationary stacks (based on fuels and raw materials, n = 33), namely, coal boiler (COL), heavy oil boiler (HOL), wood boiler (WOD), diesel boiler (DSL), natural gas boiler (NGS), and incinerator (INR). FPM2.5 and CPM samples were collected following U.S. EPA Method 201A and Method 202, respectively. The samples were analyzed for mass concentrations and metal composit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the final CPM emission concentrations are slightly higher than FPM, and the CPM concentrations from plants #1 and #2 even exceed 10 mg/Nm 3 . Actually, the aerodynamic diameter of CPM is generally less than 2.5 μm, 16 but the mass concentrations of CPM are significantly higher than those of FPM 2.5 at each sampling site, and similar results are reported by Yang et al 44 Average mass concentrations of FPM and CPM at the WFGD-inlet are 32.48 ± 26.24 and 11.11 ± 3.83 mg/Nm 3 , while those at the stack are 7.68 ± 1.82 and 11.43 ± 2.54 mg/Nm 3 , respectively. The proportions of CPM in TPM at the WFGD-inlet range from 13.92 to 79.36% and those at the stack range from 51.82 to 65.50%.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the final CPM emission concentrations are slightly higher than FPM, and the CPM concentrations from plants #1 and #2 even exceed 10 mg/Nm 3 . Actually, the aerodynamic diameter of CPM is generally less than 2.5 μm, 16 but the mass concentrations of CPM are significantly higher than those of FPM 2.5 at each sampling site, and similar results are reported by Yang et al 44 Average mass concentrations of FPM and CPM at the WFGD-inlet are 32.48 ± 26.24 and 11.11 ± 3.83 mg/Nm 3 , while those at the stack are 7.68 ± 1.82 and 11.43 ± 2.54 mg/Nm 3 , respectively. The proportions of CPM in TPM at the WFGD-inlet range from 13.92 to 79.36% and those at the stack range from 51.82 to 65.50%.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Before entering WFGD, Se mainly exists in the forms of Se 0 , SeO 2 , or SeO 3 2− in flue gas. Yang et al 44 established the indicatory metals of filterable and condensable PM 2.5 from important stationary emission sources, and pointed out that Se was one of the important indicatory metals in CPM 2.5 and TPM 2.5 emitted from the coal boiler. Coŕdoba 46 reviewed the partitioning and speciation of Se in WFGD, and pointed out that the Se chemistry reacted in WFGD was highly complicated.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the harvesting cost required for hiring cutting machines is relatively expensive, small-scale sugarcane farmers have little choice but to burn the leftover sugarcane because of the ease of finding labour [109]. Additionally, wood combustion and sugarcane burning have been reported as potential contributors of As, Ni, Se, and V in particulate matter emitted from cogeneration power plants and factories that use wood boilers [110][111][112]. Thus, it is inferred that the significant differences in Ni/V, V/Fe, and As/V ratios of PM 2.5 samples collected at COS and BOS during haze area consequence of agricultural waste burning which usually starts from January to May (Table 3 and S1 Overall, these findings have shown that policymakers should be aware that the expansion of the sugarcane industry can inevitably lead to seasonal air quality problems, and thus non-burning alternative agricultural practices are essential.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen optimized governing equations by undertaking coordinate transformation and performed numerical simulation, with the aim of analyzing the deposition status of particles in the joint action of thermophoresis, electric field force, convection and Brownian motion [11]. Yang et al investigated the deposition effect of microparticles in a vertical pipe by using the Lagrangian trajectory tracking method, and found that the deposition effect of particles on the wall of the pipe was significantly enhanced by the combined action of thermophoresis and electrophoresis [14]. Researchers focused on electrostatic precipitators, developing a turbulent diffusion model that incorporates electrostatic transport effects in order to study the motion and sedimentation behavior of particles within the precipitator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%