2015
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2014.997386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of Chlorophyll Meter Measurements to Manage Crop Nitrogen Status in Potato Crop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies with hand-held chlorophyll meters, including the SPAD-502 equipment, reported inconsistent optimum NSI threshold for monitoring potato N status and suggested values ranging from 84 to 94.8% (Coelho et al, 2012;Giletto et al, 2010;Marouani et al, 2015). However, Bohman et al (2019) found a low degree of sensitivity to detect potato N stress (cultivar Russet Burbank) when SPAD-502 sensor was used at a NSI threshold of 95%.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies with hand-held chlorophyll meters, including the SPAD-502 equipment, reported inconsistent optimum NSI threshold for monitoring potato N status and suggested values ranging from 84 to 94.8% (Coelho et al, 2012;Giletto et al, 2010;Marouani et al, 2015). However, Bohman et al (2019) found a low degree of sensitivity to detect potato N stress (cultivar Russet Burbank) when SPAD-502 sensor was used at a NSI threshold of 95%.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPAD‐502 sensor accuracy in estimating plant N status is higher when readings are performed at the top leaflet of the fourth uppermost fully expanded leaf (Li et al., 2012). However, factors such as cultivar, growth stage, leaf thickness, reading time, leaf position, other nutrient deficiencies, water stress, and soil type may influence SPAD readings (Gianquinto et al., 2004; Giletto et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012, 2019; Marouani, Behi, Salah, & Quilez, 2015; Milagres et al., 2018; Minotti et al., 1994; Rolando, Ramírez, Yactayo, Monneveux, & Quiroz, 2015; Silva, Coelho, Braun, & Fontes, 2011; Zakeri et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2015; Zhu, Tremblay, & Liang, 2011). In order to establish a standard recommendation, it is suggested to perform SPAD‐based plant N status monitoring using nitrogen sufficiency indices (NSIs), a value obtained from the ratio of SPAD values measured in plants receiving in‐season adjusted N fertilization and those cultivated in a reference non‐limiting N supply area (Bohman, Rosen, & Mulla, 2019; Gianquinto et al., 2004; Minotti et al., 1994; Zakeri et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the weight of dry plant of the plant which was not significantly different might be due to the low N nutrient in the soil. Because N is an element which plants need in large quantities, but its presence in the soil is very mobile so that it is easily lost from the soil through washing or evaporation [18]. Lack of N will result in a decrease in plant weight of dry plant, leaf area, thereby reducing the rate of photosynthesis [19,20].…”
Section: Weight Of Dry Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen (N) is a vital element for potato growth because of its roles in photosynthetic activities, chlorophyll accumulation, crop growth, potato tuber yield and dry matter accumulation (Goffart et al, 2011;Chlingaryan et al, 2018). It is the most often limiting nutrient for potato growth and the value of the other inputs cannot be fully achived unless the amount of mineral N applied is optimal (El Mokh et al, 2015;Marouani et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%