2017
DOI: 10.29008/etc2017-315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of an open 3D steam turbine flutter test case

Abstract: This paper introduces an open three-dimensional (3D) flutter test case for steam turbines. The test case is fully described and initial results are presented. The steam turbine last stage blading geometry is taken from a test case originally presented by Durham University. The stage is representative of the aerodynamic characteristics of modern steam turbine blading. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time that a steam turbine flutter test case is presented based on an open 3D realistic blade geometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic use of a few open geometries not only allows validating numerical methods, it also leads to a sum of works that are directly comparable, that provide a better understanding of the phenomena at stake, and that can be used utimately to extract design guidelines. Recently, the idea of using open test cases was also introduced in the fields of aerodynamics and flutter in steam turbines [33,34] and structural dynamics of blades with friction dampers [35]. This latter geometry responds to researchers' needs in nonlinear structural dynamics, but it is not applicable to the case of contact interactions, as a realistic blade geometry is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic use of a few open geometries not only allows validating numerical methods, it also leads to a sum of works that are directly comparable, that provide a better understanding of the phenomena at stake, and that can be used utimately to extract design guidelines. Recently, the idea of using open test cases was also introduced in the fields of aerodynamics and flutter in steam turbines [33,34] and structural dynamics of blades with friction dampers [35]. This latter geometry responds to researchers' needs in nonlinear structural dynamics, but it is not applicable to the case of contact interactions, as a realistic blade geometry is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotor blade count was 65 with a blade length of 0.92 m. The rotational speed was 3000 min −1 . In this work, the rotor tip gap height was 2.1 mm (approximately 0.25% blade height), which was half the tip gap size in [6] but similar to the tip gap height of 2.3 mm that was used by Qi et al [7] and Sun et al [8].…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The boundary conditions for the configuration including stator and exhaust hood were taken from [7]. The stator inlet total pressure and temperature were set to 26.7 kPa and 339.5 K, respectively.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TurboGrid uses a non 1:1 mesh interface to connect the meshes from the pressure and suction side in the tip clearance. The number of mesh nodes and layers used in the spanwise direction in the tip clearance after mesh independence verification [18] is also presented in Table 2. The average y-plus of the cell height on the walls was around 20 to meet the requirement of the automatic turbulence wall function.…”
Section: Steam Turbine Flutter Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%