2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of a Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Monitoring Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Peripheral Blood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches that target T cell signaling sequences in quantitative PCR assays, real-time (qPCR) [ 16 ] or endpoint PCR (dPCR) [ 23 25 ] are suitable for CAR T cell quantification. Here, we designed our own ddPCR assays based on 2 experimental CARs with known sequences, which were validated and tested in murine experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other approaches that target T cell signaling sequences in quantitative PCR assays, real-time (qPCR) [ 16 ] or endpoint PCR (dPCR) [ 23 25 ] are suitable for CAR T cell quantification. Here, we designed our own ddPCR assays based on 2 experimental CARs with known sequences, which were validated and tested in murine experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow cytometry analysis is easy and rapid to perform and allows subcellular analysis among CAR T cell populations, but it needs to be performed on fresh samples, and the lack of sensitivity may impair analysis of long-term low-level CAR T cell persistence. Taking advantage of the presence of chimeric fusion nucleotide sequences coding for the CAR, molecular quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) may be an ideal tool for quantitative determination of rare events, as it is already used in minimal residual disease quantification in oncohematology [ 15 ] or CAR T cell monitoring in peripheral blood [ 16 ]. More recently, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), based on the multiplication of partitioned independent PCRs and Poisson statistics [ 17 ], has emerged as an easy, robust and reproducible molecular tool that may replace classical qPCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimized CAR qPCR protocols have been developed to detect the anti-CD19 (clone FMC63) scFv. Wang et al (9) developed and validated TaqMan qPCR primers and probes for a ∼130 bp amplicon from the FMC63 nucleotide sequence. In their assay, qPCR was performed side-by-side against FMC63 and GAPDH to measure CAR copy number and genome copies, respectively.…”
Section: Real-time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are no available standardized methods for monitoring in vivo behaviors and targeting the efficacy of injected CAR T-cells. The most common (but limited) techniques used to identify CAR T-cells in the body are flow cytometry, biopsy/immunohistochemistry (IHC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISpot), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [9][10][11][12]. Unfortunately, none of these can monitor CAR T-cells within a live body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%