1993
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3123-3128.1993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of a quality assurance program for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA polymerase chain reaction assays by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. ACTG PCR Working Group, and the ACTG PCR Virology Laboratories

Abstract: This study reports the rates of phenotypic switching in strains of Candida albicans isolated from superficial and invasive infections. Of 19 invasive strains, 68% showed switching activity, often at very high rates, compared with only 28% of 40 strains isolated from superficial sites (P = 0.004).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases those studies were limited because they involved the use of nonstandardized assays, tested a limited number of samples, used different and sometimes poorly defined endpoints, and did not involve rigorous statistical analysis (1,3,16). While PCR-based assays are generally more sensitive than hybridization assays for nucleic acid quantification, in-house PCR assays tend to be very poorly standardized (9,17,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases those studies were limited because they involved the use of nonstandardized assays, tested a limited number of samples, used different and sometimes poorly defined endpoints, and did not involve rigorous statistical analysis (1,3,16). While PCR-based assays are generally more sensitive than hybridization assays for nucleic acid quantification, in-house PCR assays tend to be very poorly standardized (9,17,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test is based on single-step reverse transcription and amplification of enterovirus RNA, and it incorporates enzymatic elimination of amplicon contamination, thus harmonizing and simplifying laboratory procedures and reducing the risk of false positivity due to carryover of previously amplified nucleic acid. However, quality assurance procedures will be required to ensure test sensitivity, specificity, and reliability; experience with PCR assays for other viruses has revealed considerable interlaboratory variation in sensitivity, specificity, and reliability, which is partially but not completely alleviated by the use of standardized methods or commercial assays (46,93,185,351,442,485,486).…”
Section: Enterovirus Detection By Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even when such a reference panel is available, the comparison of in-house PCR assays between centers can prove to be disappointing, as was the case with hepatitis C virus (19), for which erroneous results were reported by 52% of the laboratories. Moreover, even when centers used the same commercially available kit for the PCR detection of HIV, the results were not always in agreement (10), emphasizing the fact that staff expertise and laboratory facilities can also affect the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the virus and/or viral nucleic acid is associated with the plasma fraction, reference panels can be set up by ''spiking'' plasma with different amounts of viral nucleic acid and/or virus (19). For HIV, reference panels have been set up by spiking blood with lymphoid cell lines infected with HIV in vitro (10), as well as by using whole blood specimens from well-characterized patients known to be consistently PCR positive (10). Neither of these latter approaches is easily adopted for CMV, since we do not have an in vitro model which reflects the physiologic state of CMV in the blood and CMV viremia is usually of shorter duration and of lower magnitude than viremia with viruses such as hepatitis C virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%