2013
DOI: 10.1080/15321819.2013.779924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of a Competitive Elisa for Detection of Florfenicol Antibiotic in Food of Animal Origin

Abstract: Florfenicol (FF) is a synthetic antibiotic with a broad antibacterial spectrum and the high therapeutic effectiveness that has been developed specifically for veterinary use. Obviously, FF adulterated in animal supplies is one of essential global concerns. A competitive ELISA for the detection of florfenicol in food of animal origin (swine, chicken, and fish) is described. Influence of immunoconjugate structure on the assay sensitivity and specificity was investigated. The new ELISA showed much lower than the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Several immunoassays for detection of FF have been recently reported. 23,24 However, there were only two reported methods for analysis of both FF and TAP in one immunoassay. 25,26 We have previously published two articles for determination of FF and its metabolite FFA in animal meat products, 27,28 in which the polyclonal antibodies can bind with FF and FFA with high cross-reactivity (CR), only with a CR of 4.0% for TAP, and thus not suitable for determination of TAP in animal meat products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Several immunoassays for detection of FF have been recently reported. 23,24 However, there were only two reported methods for analysis of both FF and TAP in one immunoassay. 25,26 We have previously published two articles for determination of FF and its metabolite FFA in animal meat products, 27,28 in which the polyclonal antibodies can bind with FF and FFA with high cross-reactivity (CR), only with a CR of 4.0% for TAP, and thus not suitable for determination of TAP in animal meat products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%