2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment, dispersal and impact of the flower-galling mite Aceria lantanae (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyidae) on Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, among the different populations of St. John's wort present in Australia, two of them did not support the development of A. hyperici populations, while the other four were susceptible, but showed some variations in population growth and impact on the plants [24]. This pattern is similar to what was also observed with A. malherbae on field bindweed, Aceria lantanae (Cook) on lantana (Lantana camara L., Verbenaceae) or A. altamurgensis on medusahead, for which variations in the susceptibility to infestation was experimentally demonstrated by testing different populations of their respective targets [103,[110][111][112]. However, A. altamurgensis performed very poorly on the medusahead plants from the location where it was collected (i.e., Apulia, Italy), whereas it performed much better on plants from Sicily, Italy, and from Idaho and Nevada, USA [110].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Eriophyid Mite Host Plant Specificity and Its supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, among the different populations of St. John's wort present in Australia, two of them did not support the development of A. hyperici populations, while the other four were susceptible, but showed some variations in population growth and impact on the plants [24]. This pattern is similar to what was also observed with A. malherbae on field bindweed, Aceria lantanae (Cook) on lantana (Lantana camara L., Verbenaceae) or A. altamurgensis on medusahead, for which variations in the susceptibility to infestation was experimentally demonstrated by testing different populations of their respective targets [103,[110][111][112]. However, A. altamurgensis performed very poorly on the medusahead plants from the location where it was collected (i.e., Apulia, Italy), whereas it performed much better on plants from Sicily, Italy, and from Idaho and Nevada, USA [110].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Eriophyid Mite Host Plant Specificity and Its supporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is not unique to this system and mowing has been investigated as an integrated management strategy for the control of the light pink 163LP variety of lantana using A. lantanae [120]. In particular, the combination of mowing did not seem to affect the mite's occurrence and infestation patterns [111], however, there was a 78.5% increase in the number of galled inflorescences per shoot, when compared to plants that were not mowed [120]. These studies highlight potential problems of relying solely on laboratory studies.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Eriophyid Mite Impact On the Target Weed And Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the impact of established agents, insecticidal exclusion methods are often used, which enable comparisons of host plant fitness between agentinfested and agent-free plants (Crawley 1989;Tipping and Center 2002), thus quantifying the impact of the biocontrol agents on plant performance (Cilliers 1987;Lonsdale et al 1995;Adair and Holtkamp 1999;Sheppard et al 2001;Mukwevho et al 2017). An earlier study (Cilliers 1987) quantified the impact of three introduced leaf-attacking biocontrol agents on the growth of a pink-flowered lantana variety under maritime climatic conditions on the coast of KwaZulu-Natal Province (KZN), South Africa, where they were found to be significantly damaging to the vegetative growth of the weed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, laboratory results may not always accurately predict agent performance under field conditions (Morin et al 2009). In recent years, a field-based insecticidal exclusion experiment, also conducted in the coastal province of KZN, measuring the impact of lantana biocontrol agents, mainly focusing on a new bud-attacking agent, A. lantanae, found significant reductions in the reproductive output of the weed (Mukwevho et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mites disperse themselves by walking ( Sabelis & Dicke, 1985 ) to find a suitable site for colonization and feeding ( Tixier, Kreiter & Auger, 2000 ; Aguilar-Fenollosa et al, 2016 ; Moerman, 2016 ; Mukwevho, Olckers & Simelane, 2017 ; Sousa et al, 2019 ). One major factor for dispersal is environmental contamination, due to pesticide application ( Lima et al, 2015 ; Guedes et al, 2016 ; Mohammed et al, 2019 ; Monteiro et al, 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%