2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.655169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment and Validation of a 5 m6A RNA Methylation Regulatory Gene Prognostic Model in Low-Grade Glioma

Abstract: Background: The prognosis of low-grade glioma (LGG) is different from that of other intracranial tumors. Although many markers of LGG have been established, few are used in clinical practice. M6A methylation significantly affects the biological behavior of LGG tumors. Therefore, establishment of an LGG prognostic model based on m6A methylation regulatory genes is of great interest.Methods: Data from 495 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and 172 patients from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, some m6A based risk score models have also been proposed for predicting the prognosis of glioma patients 32 , 33 . Recently, m6A methylation regulatory genes have been used to classify patients with low-grade gliomas into high- or low-risk subgroups 34 . Similarly, the m6A-related microRNA risk model has been used as a predictive biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy in low-grade gliomas 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some m6A based risk score models have also been proposed for predicting the prognosis of glioma patients 32 , 33 . Recently, m6A methylation regulatory genes have been used to classify patients with low-grade gliomas into high- or low-risk subgroups 34 . Similarly, the m6A-related microRNA risk model has been used as a predictive biomarker for prognosis and immunotherapy in low-grade gliomas 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific role of cuproptosis in LGG remains unclear. Furthermore, although many prognostic signatures have been established based on the patterns of pseudogenes ( 43 ), N6-methylandenosine ( 44 ), immunity ( 45 ), ferroptosis ( 46 ), and pyroptosis ( 47 ) their predictive ability needs to be further improved, and there is still a lack of a prognostic signature based on the characteristics of cuproptosis. In the present study, we systematically investigated the global alterations in 13 CRGs at genetic and transcriptional levels in LGG, established a scoring system consisting of five signature core genes, and eventually constructed a quantitative nomogram by integrating the CRG score and clinicopathological features including grades, IDH status, and age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan et al looked at immune-related genes in LGG and discovered six genetic markers that could help diagnose LGG and predict patient prognoses (11). Bai et al examined N6-adenosine methylation (m6A) methylation-regulated genes in LGG and built a prognostic model based on their findings, to improve prognosis prediction accuracy in LGG patients (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bai et al. examined N6-adenosine methylation (m6A) methylation-regulated genes in LGG and built a prognostic model based on their findings, to improve prognosis prediction accuracy in LGG patients ( 12 ). Using Cox regression analysis, Liu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%