2011
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V)

Abstract: Although both CAPE-V and GRBAS reliability coefficients varied across raters and parameters, this study reports slightly improved rater reliability using the CAPE-V to make perceptual judgments of voice quality in comparison to the GRBAS scale. The results provide evidence for the empirical (concurrent) validity of the CAPE-V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
113
3
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
113
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment procedures were carried out within 2 weeks of an established diagnosis. Auditory-perceptual assessment was conducted using the Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V; Kempster, Gerratt, Verdolini Abbott, Barkmeier-Kramer, & Hillman, 2009;Zraick et al, 2011). This assessment provides a measure of the clinician's perceptual ratings of a patient's voice on a variety of parameters, including breathiness, roughness, strain, pitch, loudness, and overall severity.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment procedures were carried out within 2 weeks of an established diagnosis. Auditory-perceptual assessment was conducted using the Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V; Kempster, Gerratt, Verdolini Abbott, Barkmeier-Kramer, & Hillman, 2009;Zraick et al, 2011). This assessment provides a measure of the clinician's perceptual ratings of a patient's voice on a variety of parameters, including breathiness, roughness, strain, pitch, loudness, and overall severity.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high score on the VHI indicates important voice difficulties. We translated and modified the Consensus AuditoryPerceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) (Zraick et al 2011) in order to perform perceptual self-assessment of dysphonia in 6 points (i.e., voice strain, roughness, breathiness, etc.) on a 100 mm visual analog scale (0= not at all, 100=extremely).…”
Section: Voice and Communication Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAPE-V was also shown to have concurrent validity. 89 These instruments were designed for use by professionals with expertise and training in audio-perceptual aspects of voice. For individuals without such training and expertise, a simple method for acquiring preoperative auditory-perceptual judgments of the patient's voice can be achieved by completing an audio recording of the patient's voice while they sustain a vowel sound such as "ah" or "ee" for 3 to 5 seconds and then while they read standard sentences or spontaneously converse for 30 seconds to 1 minute.…”
Section: No Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%