2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Transfer of Compound Control in Children: A Stimulus Control Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carpentier et al (2002aCarpentier et al ( , 2003b reported that 5-year-old children readily pass equivalence tests but, in contrast to older children and adults, seldom pass equivalence-equivalence tests. These findings are consistent with many studies in which analogical performance increases with age and indicate that stimulus equivalence precedes equivalence-equivalence .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carpentier et al (2002aCarpentier et al ( , 2003b reported that 5-year-old children readily pass equivalence tests but, in contrast to older children and adults, seldom pass equivalence-equivalence tests. These findings are consistent with many studies in which analogical performance increases with age and indicate that stimulus equivalence precedes equivalence-equivalence .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After being trained on conditional A-B and A-C discrimination tasks and on a simple O-discrimination task (01+/02-), most subjects (a) selected BC compounds with same-class elements in a BC discrimination test (e.g., B1C1+/B1C2-), and (b) matched BC compounds with other BC compounds and with unitary 0 stimuli of same discriminative functions (e.g., B1C1-B3C3, B1C2-B2C3; 01-B3C3, 02-B2C3) . Because (a) the BC-Face (Carpentier et aI., 2003b) and O-BC performances (Carpentier et aI., 2004) could have resulted only from matching same discriminative functions, and (b) previous studies have shown that adults and children readily relate stimuli to any other stimuli of same discriminative functions (Carpentier, Smeets, & Barnes-Holmes, 2002a, 2002c, 2003aPerez-Gonzalez, 1994;Perez-Gonzalez & Serna, 2003), it should be assumed that the BC-BC performances were based on the same process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking in to the context of health behavior change, RFT provides advantages in the degree of precision made possible when analyzing verbal contributions to complex human behavior. When applied to the topic of health related behaviors, it provides a preliminary behavioral account for how specific verbal rules come to exert control over responding ( Barnes and Keenan, 1993 ; Carpentier et al, 2002 ). For example, the sound of the word “cigarette” is placed in a “frame of coordination” or “sameness” with a thin cylinder of finely cut tobacco rolled in paper.…”
Section: Relational Frame Theory and Health Behavior Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFT offers a detailed analysis of the influence of language on complex human behavior by analyzing changes in health behavior and allowing to analyze how specific verbal rules exercise control over response (Barnes & Keenan, 1993;Carpentier, Smeets, & Barnes-Holmes, 2002). Behavior change should not only act on the interruption of unhealthy behaviors, but also on strengthening or weakening existing relational responses and learning new relational responses in the context of healthy behaviors.…”
Section: Reorienting the Agent Towards A System Of (Value) Changementioning
confidence: 99%