2013
DOI: 10.1177/1071100713504746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing the Relationship Between Clinical Outcome and Extent of Osseous Bridging Between Computed Tomography Assessment in Isolated Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions

Abstract: Level IV, case series.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical improvements did not increase significantly beyond 50% of bridging trabeculation. 6 This supports the use of 50% fusion area as an appropriate threshold for radiographic success; it is possible that if the cutoff had been lower in this study, the kappa values may have been even stronger. While the results of their study were substantial, the authors of this study utilized radiologist interpretation of the CT scans to validate their criteria for fusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical improvements did not increase significantly beyond 50% of bridging trabeculation. 6 This supports the use of 50% fusion area as an appropriate threshold for radiographic success; it is possible that if the cutoff had been lower in this study, the kappa values may have been even stronger. While the results of their study were substantial, the authors of this study utilized radiologist interpretation of the CT scans to validate their criteria for fusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In their study, the greatest amount of clinical improvement was seen when the degree of osseous bridging across the joint was at a minimum of 25%. 6 These studies raise the question of how reliable CT scan interpretation is in determining the degree of fusion present, particularly taking into account image degradation or artifact due to hardware, the 2…”
Section: (Original) Clinical Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion mass at each joint was then graded using a 4-point scale (grade 1, 0% to 25% of the joint surface; grade 2, 26% to 50% of the joint surface; grade 3, 51% to 75% of the joint surface; and grade 4, 76% to 100% of the joint surface) by 2 independent reviewers in 2 separate settings (L.B.H., C.F.). Radiographic union was defined as a fusion mass of grade !2 according to the most recent radiographs, as described by Glazebrook et al (31). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were determined for this measurement.…”
Section: Follow-up Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT scans can be used to assess percentage of fusion or to guide mobility, with 25% fusion mass indicative of a clinically successful fusion, although more fusion is shown to be beneficial. 41 Time to union has been reported to average 14.5 weeks with open arthrodesis. 82 Minimally invasive techniques.…”
Section: Ankle Arthrodesismentioning
confidence: 99%