Establishing Statistical Equivalence of Data from Different Sampling Approaches for Assessment of Bacterial Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance

Abstract

To assess phenotypic bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in different strata (e.g., host populations, environmental areas, manure, or sewage effluents) for epidemiological purposes, isolates of target bacteria can be obtained from a stratum using various sample types. Also, different sample processing methods can be applied. The MIC of each target antimicrobial drug for each isolate is measured. Statistical equivalence testing of the MIC data for the isolates allows evaluation of whether different sample types or sample processing methods yield equivalent estimates of the bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility in the stratum. We demonstrate this approach on the antimicrobial susceptibility estimates for (i) nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. from ground or trimmed meat versus cecal content samples of cattle in processing plants in 2013-2014 and (ii) nontyphoidal Salmonella spp. from urine, fecal, and blood human samples in 2015 (U.S. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System data). We found that the sample types for cattle yielded nonequivalent susceptibility estimates for several antimicrobial drug classes and thus may gauge distinct subpopulations of salmonellae. The quinolone and fluoroquinolone susceptibility estimates for nontyphoidal salmonellae from human blood are nonequivalent to those from urine or feces, conjecturally due to the fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin) use to treat infections caused by nontyphoidal salmonellae. We also demonstrate statistical equivalence testing for comparing sample processing methods for fecal samples (culturing one versus multiple aliquots per sample) to assess AMR in fecal Escherichia coli. These methods yield equivalent results, except for tetracyclines. Importantly, statistical equivalence testing provides the MIC difference at which the data from two sample types or sample processing methods differ statistically. Data users (e.g., microbiologists and epidemiologists) may then interpret practical relevance of the difference.IMPORTANCE Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) needs to be assessed in different populations or strata for the purposes of surveillance and determination of the efficacy of interventions to halt AMR dissemination. To assess phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility, isolates of target bacteria can be obtained from a stratum using different sample types or employing different sample processing methods in the laboratory. The MIC of each target antimicrobial drug for each of the isolates is measured, yielding the MIC distribution across the isolates from each sample type or sample processing method. We describe statistical equivalence testing for the MIC data for evaluating whether two sample types or sample processing methods yield equivalent estimates of the bacterial phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility in the stratum. This includes estimating the MIC difference at which the data from the two approaches differ statistically. Data users (e.g., microbiologists, epidemiologists, and public health professionals) can then interpret whe...

Development and selection of low-level multi-drug resistance over an extended range of sub-inhibitory ciprofloxacin concentrations in Escherichia coli

“…All fold changes in MIC were expressed relative to the drug-free control, which matched the MIC of WT parental cells in all experiments. MIC measurements do not follow normal distributions assumed for parametric statistical tests 65 . Therefore, we performed a one-tailed Wilcoxon ranked sum test to determine whether the MIC of stains after treatment were statistically significantly higher compared to the MIC of the drug-free control sample.…”

Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance in Select Tertiary Hospitals in Uganda: An Evaluation of 2020 to 2023 Routine Surveillance Data

“…Resistance to several antibiotics including, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, and erythromycin, significantly differed among the specimen types. This finding may have implications for empirical therapy for different infectious syndromes, as the infection may be due to microorganisms of the same species but different strains [ 30 , 31 ]. However, few prior research efforts have focused on the effect of specimen type on AMR.…”

“…Likewise, Escherichia coli isolated from sputum had higher resistance to common antibiotics compared to those isolated from blood and urine, except for urine, where Escherichia coli was more resistant to fluoroquinolones than that from sputum [ 33 ]. Similarly, Salmonella enterica isolated from urine, blood, and stool had differing resistance to cephems, macrolides, phenicols, tetracyclines, and quinolones [ 30 ]. The largest difference was observed with quinolones, to which the isolates from blood were less susceptible compared to those from urine or feces [ 30 ].…”

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance: can we estimate resistance in bloodstream infections from other types of specimen?

“…13 A 2018 study showed statistical non-equivalence of antimicrobial susceptibility in nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica from blood, urine and faecal samples from 2015 U.S. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System data. 14 Longitudinal surveillance of Escherichia coli bloodstream and urinary infections in a large UK region (Oxfordshire) found similar trends in co-amoxiclav resistance over 19 years. 15 Another Oxfordshire study also found similar trends over time in nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from blood and non-blood clinical samples between 1998 and 2006, 16 but changes in trends were identified earlier from non-blood samples due to higher numbers.…”