The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10933-010-9440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing reliable minimum count sizes for cladoceran subfossils sampled from lake sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
72
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We counted and identified remains from a minimum of 90 individual cladocerans per sample [31,32], of which a mean of 78 and 61% were pelagic taxa in the Ontario and Nova Scotia lakes, respectively. This count is sufficient to characterize the taxonomic assemblage accurately [33]. We tested whether the contribution of Holopedium to planktonic cladoceran assemblages had changed since pre-industrial times using paired t-tests comparing Holopedium relative abundance in the pre-industrial versus recent lakewater Ca decline?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We counted and identified remains from a minimum of 90 individual cladocerans per sample [31,32], of which a mean of 78 and 61% were pelagic taxa in the Ontario and Nova Scotia lakes, respectively. This count is sufficient to characterize the taxonomic assemblage accurately [33]. We tested whether the contribution of Holopedium to planktonic cladoceran assemblages had changed since pre-industrial times using paired t-tests comparing Holopedium relative abundance in the pre-industrial versus recent lakewater Ca decline?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxonomical identification was based on Flössner (2000), Margaritora (1983) and Szeroczyńska and Sarmaja-Korjonen (2007). Three to six slides were counted for each sample in order to obtain a minimum of 100 Cladocera individuals (Kurek et al, 2010). This minimum was not achieved in a few samples with extremely scarce Cladocera remains.…”
Section: Subfossil Cladoceramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurek et al (2010) examined the effect of cladoceran count sizes on species richness and the relative abundances of dominant taxa, and they showed that counts of at least 70-100 individuals were required for accuracy. Reavie and Juggins (2011) explored the effects of training-set size on the performance of diatom-based inference models that predict limnetic total phosphorus.…”
Section: Transfer Function Models: Improvements and Qualificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%