2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79571-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing primary surface rupture evidence and magnitude of the 1697 CE Sadiya earthquake at the Eastern Himalayan Frontal thrust, India

Abstract: Historical archives refer to often recurring earthquakes along the Eastern Himalaya for which geological evidence is lacking, raising the question of whether these events ruptured the surface or remained blind, and how do they contribute to the seismic budget of the region, which is home to millions of inhabitants. We report a first mega trench excavation at Himebasti village, Arunachal Pradesh, India, and analyze it with modern geological techniques. The study includes twenty-one radiocarbon dates to limit th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eastern region has experienced a few historical earthquakes, and some recent paleoseismological studies have highlighted interesting results. For example, the study carried out by Rao et al (2017), based on trenches at Pasighat, Arunachal region has provided chronological constraint on the paleoearthquake surface rupture and suggested that the 1950 (Mw 8.7) Assam earthquake did break the eastern Himalayan front and produced a co-seismic slip of 5.5 ± 0.7 m. Another recent study from Pasighat (Coudurier-Curveur et al 2020) inferred uplift and abandonment of terraces of elevations between 2.6 ± 0.1 m to 7.3 ± 0.1 m and 11.5 ± 0.1 m. Similarly, another episode of surface rupture was reported from the trench studies (across a scarp in Himebasti Village) on the eastern bank of the Subansiri River along the MFT (Pandey et al 2021). The causative earthquake was believed to have occurred in the age ranging between 1655 and 1826 CE and it is further argued that the most recent rupture at Himebasti occurred after 1450-1650 A.D.…”
Section: Paleoseismological Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The eastern region has experienced a few historical earthquakes, and some recent paleoseismological studies have highlighted interesting results. For example, the study carried out by Rao et al (2017), based on trenches at Pasighat, Arunachal region has provided chronological constraint on the paleoearthquake surface rupture and suggested that the 1950 (Mw 8.7) Assam earthquake did break the eastern Himalayan front and produced a co-seismic slip of 5.5 ± 0.7 m. Another recent study from Pasighat (Coudurier-Curveur et al 2020) inferred uplift and abandonment of terraces of elevations between 2.6 ± 0.1 m to 7.3 ± 0.1 m and 11.5 ± 0.1 m. Similarly, another episode of surface rupture was reported from the trench studies (across a scarp in Himebasti Village) on the eastern bank of the Subansiri River along the MFT (Pandey et al 2021). The causative earthquake was believed to have occurred in the age ranging between 1655 and 1826 CE and it is further argued that the most recent rupture at Himebasti occurred after 1450-1650 A.D.…”
Section: Paleoseismological Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Inset 1 shows epicenter of last millennial earthquakes in the Himalaya and the Indo-Eurasian plate convergence (Bettinelli et al, 2006;Stevens & Avouac, 2015 A trench at Pasighat reported 1950 surface faulting beneath a ∼3.1 m high fault scarp on the HFT with a co-seismic slip of 5.5 ± 0.7 m (Priyanka et al, 2017). Approximately 130 km west of Pasighat site at Himebasti village, surface faulting by the historical 1697 Sadiya earthquake was documented (Pandey et al, 2021). Further west at Harmutty, the surface faulting with a smaller offset of 2 m was correlated with the 1950 event only because of the closeness of the trench to the 1950 epicentral region (Kumar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (a) Regional seismo‐tectonic map of the eastern Himalaya showing the study area at a‐Kamlang Nagar (green solid square), rupture zones of major historical earthquakes (after Bilham, 2019; light green polygons), thrust faults—Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT), Mishmi Thrust (MT) and Naga Thrust (NT) denoted by red line with dentition, location of archeological Bhismaknagar Fort (Kri, 2010; light green ellipse), co‐seismic landslides (Rao, 1953), Indian Meteorological Department earthquake data from 1969 to 2017 and ISC‐EHB earthquake catalog from 1905 to 2017, epicentral location (red star) and fault plane solutions of 1950 earthquake (Ben‐Menahem et al., 1974; Chen & Molnar, 1977), previous paleoseismological trench locations (yellow solid squares) at b‐Pasighat (Priyanka et al., 2017), c‐Marbang (Jayangondaperumal et al., 2011), d‐Himebasti (Pandey et al., 2021), e‐Harmutty and f‐Nameri (Kumar et al., 2010), g‐Sarpang Chu (Le Roux‐Mallouf et al., 2016), 1950 isoseismals (Rao, 1953; black dashed lines), LL is the locking line at 3.5 km elevation contour (Avouac, 2003; Mishra et al., 2016). Inset 1 shows epicenter of last millennial earthquakes in the Himalaya and the Indo‐Eurasian plate convergence (Bettinelli et al., 2006; Stevens & Avouac, 2015; black arrows).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…)Mishra et al (2016); (34) Kumar et al (2010); (35) LeRoux-Mallouf et al (2020); (36) Dashgupta et al (2013);(37)LeRoux-Mallouf et al (2016); (38)Gupta et al (2017); (39)Pandey et al (2021); (40)Jayangondaperumal et al (2011); (41) Priyanka et al (…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%