2021
DOI: 10.1097/nur.0000000000000604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Performance Evaluation for Quality Inspection of Specialty Nurses

Abstract: Purpose The present study aimed to establish an index system for the performance evaluation of specialty nurses (SNs) in tertiary hospitals. Background An objective index system for performance evaluation of SN has not yet been established in China. Design A 2-round Delphi survey sought opinions from experts about the index system for SNs' performance evaluation in tertiary hospitals in China. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After distribution, we had full communication with the experts, explaining the purpose and requirements of our correspondence, clarifying any questionable entries, and requesting that they return the questionnaire via email within one week. The weight of the competency indicator index [ 22 ] was calculated using the Delphi method, and the indicator with a mean value ≥ 4 was considered important. The coefficient of variation ≤ 25% was considered as the screening criteria, and at least 75% consistency was noted among experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After distribution, we had full communication with the experts, explaining the purpose and requirements of our correspondence, clarifying any questionable entries, and requesting that they return the questionnaire via email within one week. The weight of the competency indicator index [ 22 ] was calculated using the Delphi method, and the indicator with a mean value ≥ 4 was considered important. The coefficient of variation ≤ 25% was considered as the screening criteria, and at least 75% consistency was noted among experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both rounds of the questionnaire were administered by the team leader through emails; the responses were required to be returned by emails within 1 week. The weight of the competency indicator index (Cai et al, 2021 ) was calculated using the Delphi method, and the indicator with a mean value ≥4 was considered important. The coefficient of variation ≤25% was considered as the screening criteria, and at least 75% consistency was noted among experts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of the competency indicator index (Cai et al, 2021) was calculated using the Delphi method, and the indicator with a mean value ≥4 was considered important. The coefficient of variation ≤25% was considered as the screening criteria, and at least 75% consistency was noted among experts.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demographic data of the individuals included in the Delphi panel are shown in Table 1. [21] Indicators with a mean importance rating of ≥ 4.0 and a coe cient of variation of ≤ 0.25 were retained as screening criteria. Additionally, there needed to be at least 75% agreement among the experts.…”
Section: The Expert Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%