2015
DOI: 10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing optimal gap size for precast beam bridges with a buffer-gap-elastomeric bearings system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dashpots are installed at the base, to simulate the half‐space below the 20 m of the soil. The damping coefficient is calculated as follows: Cbgoodbreak=ρVSA where ρ = 2.1 t/m 3 the clay material density, V s the shear‐wave velocity corresponding to half‐space, and A the effective area of each dashpot. In addition, ‘node‐to‐node’ kinematic constraints are applied along the lateral boundaries of the model (forcing two nodes to have identical displacements).…”
Section: Numerical Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dashpots are installed at the base, to simulate the half‐space below the 20 m of the soil. The damping coefficient is calculated as follows: Cbgoodbreak=ρVSA where ρ = 2.1 t/m 3 the clay material density, V s the shear‐wave velocity corresponding to half‐space, and A the effective area of each dashpot. In addition, ‘node‐to‐node’ kinematic constraints are applied along the lateral boundaries of the model (forcing two nodes to have identical displacements).…”
Section: Numerical Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Essentially, horizontal isolation is achieved by decoupling the superstructure from its base during shaking and hence, preventing load transfer to the structural members. 2 To this end, a variety of seismic isolation devices have been developed, mainly for applications in bridges and structures of high importance, comprising from simple elastomeric bearings (with and without lead core 3 ) to more sophisticated roller bearings and viscous dampers. However, the solution of the base isolation is not panacea and cannot be implemented in every structural application; accelerations are controlled and maintained within reasonable limits, but the demand for large base displacements renders this technology inadequate for a number of cases.…”
Section: Introduction and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these structures still suffer from permanent drifts and increased top storey accelerations, which can result in loss of serviceability, material and equipment damage, and potential degradation of the structural members [1]. To this end, seismic isolation has been one of the main approaches to decouple the superstructure from the foundation level and thus, protect the structure from the loads transferred during earthquake excitation [2][3][4][5]. The main drawback of such approach is the required large base displacement and complex implementation, rendering the system expensive and inadequate for retrofitting of existing structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation systems in the bases of the structures essentially provide horizontal isolation from the effects of earthquake shaking by decoupling the superstructure from the base‐foundation during earthquakes. In this context, a variety of isolation devices including elastomeric bearings (with and without lead core), frictional/sliding bearings, and roller bearings have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%