2019
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-0374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing New Norms for Developmental Milestones

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric surveillance of young children depends on providers' assessment of developmental milestones, yet normative data are sparse. Our objectives were to develop new norms for common milestones to aid in clinical interpretation of milestone attainment. METHODS:We analyzed responses to the developmental screening form of the Survey of Wellbeing of Young Children from 41 465 screens across 3 states. Associations between developmental status and a range of child characteristics were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
35
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that age of first concern, which were later in females, predicted age of diagnosis further supports the need for more awareness and targeted screening for females, especially those who are verbal. Our findings, together with previous research [McCormick et al, 2020], can help inform prospective screening practices and suggest that screening criteria might need to be modified to identify verbal females who may not get “flagged” as early if their language is not as delayed as males or developing in line with CDC milestones [Sheldrick et al, 2019].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The finding that age of first concern, which were later in females, predicted age of diagnosis further supports the need for more awareness and targeted screening for females, especially those who are verbal. Our findings, together with previous research [McCormick et al, 2020], can help inform prospective screening practices and suggest that screening criteria might need to be modified to identify verbal females who may not get “flagged” as early if their language is not as delayed as males or developing in line with CDC milestones [Sheldrick et al, 2019].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Differences in language milestones reported between NT males and females appear to be mirrored in ASD. However, while females with ASD may have an advantage over males with ASD, their language milestones are still delayed compared to NT populations with the average age of first word in children with NT outcomes reported around 12 months of age [Darley & Winitz, 1961; Nelson, 1981; Sheldrick et al, 2019]. In the current sample, while age of first word and age of first three‐word phrase did not predict age of first concerns or age at diagnosis, these results are consistent with recent population‐based findings suggesting that ASD females with more advanced language abilities are diagnosed later than ASD males [McCormick et al, 2020].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 10, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.07.21254183 doi: medRxiv preprint DEVELOPMENTAL MILESTONES 7 developmental milestones of interest. The minimum age was selected because normative acquisition of the milestones considered in these analyses occurs before the age of 3 years (Centers for Disease Control, June 10, 2020; Sheldrick et al, 2019;World Health Organization, 2006). This allowed for the interpretation of milestones which were reportedly "not yet achieved" as "delayed.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there is the issue of broad-band versus narrowband screening tests and questionnaires. Broad-band instruments such as the Survey of Well Being of Young Children (Sheldrick et al, 2019) that measures milestones, socialemotional function, ASD, and family risk factors, or the Developmental Indicators for the Assessment of Learning (4th ed. ; Mardell & Goldenberg, 2011) are useful when the referral reason is more general because they can pinpoint previously unidentified areas of concern.…”
Section: Problems In Test Selection and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%