2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
7
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
38
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey used previously (2017) in a CT dose survey performed in Egypt in collaboration with IAEA, which was kindly shared by the author. The data collected comprise scanner information, routine CT protocols, patient weight, examination data, and dose indices (CTDI and DLP) [3].…”
Section: Survey Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey used previously (2017) in a CT dose survey performed in Egypt in collaboration with IAEA, which was kindly shared by the author. The data collected comprise scanner information, routine CT protocols, patient weight, examination data, and dose indices (CTDI and DLP) [3].…”
Section: Survey Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRLs are a tool used to identify situations in which radiation dosage is unusually elevated [2]. The establishment of DRLs is considered the initial step in the radiation dose monitoring process [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the risk of CT radiation exposure in children should be justified and optimized according to the "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" (ALARA) principle. However, several studies have found large differences in radiographic imaging procedures at different hospitals, prominent to varying degrees of radiation exposure on patients [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the DRL has been proposed as the 75th percentile (third quartile) of the national dose apportioning ever since it was first established by the ICRP in 1996. Noting that, professionals or regulatory bodies may determine a national DRL from wide-ranging surveys at hospitals in a region or country [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the findings on dose measurement and image quality metric quantification capability, the use of the in-house phantom in assessing CT system performance can be suggested for routine use by clinical medical physicists. The designed phantom's capability to serve as dose measurement tool allows routine application for dose survey in the clinical setting [16], establishment of diagnostic reference levels [17], and dose comparison upon introduction of new techniques or technology [18]. Contrast and CT number linearity reproducibility also indicated that the in-house phantom can also be useful for image quality quantification as well as dose management and optimization studies [19,20].…”
Section: Image Quality Metric Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%