2016
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing motion control in children with autism and intellectual disability: Applications for anatomical and functional MRI

Abstract: Excessive motion makes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) extremely challenging among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The medical risks of sedation establish the need for behavioral interventions to promote motion control among children with ASD undergoing MRI scans. We present a series of experiments aimed at establishing both tolerance of the MRI environment and a level of motion control that would be compatible with a successful MRI. During Study 1, we evaluated the effects of prompting and cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre-visit interview with parents to identify individualised reinforcers and preferred Interestingly, we found some preliminary evidence that out-of-scanner head motion could predict that observed in-scanner during the MRI scan. This secondary finding is consistent with recent efforts to mitigate the effects of head motion with real-time feedback during mock training, where outcomes in head movement reduction were demonstrated to be generalizable to an actual MRI setting (Cox, Virues-Ortega, Julio, & Martin, 2017;Greene et al, 2018). The procedure involves training participants to reduce head movement by providing immediate visual feedback once head motion exceeds a certain threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Pre-visit interview with parents to identify individualised reinforcers and preferred Interestingly, we found some preliminary evidence that out-of-scanner head motion could predict that observed in-scanner during the MRI scan. This secondary finding is consistent with recent efforts to mitigate the effects of head motion with real-time feedback during mock training, where outcomes in head movement reduction were demonstrated to be generalizable to an actual MRI setting (Cox, Virues-Ortega, Julio, & Martin, 2017;Greene et al, 2018). The procedure involves training participants to reduce head movement by providing immediate visual feedback once head motion exceeds a certain threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Individuals with FXS and other types of ASD may experience claustrophobia and anxiety when asked to enter a scanner. For this reason behavioral psychologists have developed mock scan techniques to desensitize individuals with FXS and other developmental disabilities to maintain a stationary position for the duration of scans (12)(13)(14). Higher functioning individuals with FXS can typically be trained with a mock scanner to complete the process with an actual scan.…”
Section: Stillnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with MV individuals, challenges related to behavioral compliance and task comprehension constrain research in this population (e.g. Cox, Virues‐Ortega, Julio, & Martin, ); consequently, most neuroimaging research with this population has focused on assessing structural, rather than functional, atypicalities. To evaluate extant literature on structural neuroimaging studies of ASD + ID we conducted a PubMed search (July 29, 2016) using the following search terms: (‘intellectual disability’ OR ‘mental retardation’ OR ‘low functioning’) AND (autism OR pervasive developmental disorder) AND (mri OR dti OR dwi OR voxel based morphometry OR volumetric), or variants of these terms, with a species limiter of ‘humans’ (see Appendix S1).…”
Section: Intellectual Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%