1995
DOI: 10.1080/09663699550022053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Ground: Representing gender and race in a mixed housing development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By and large, the new residents in the mixed‐income Orchard Gardens development did not provide the social benefits that are often implied by the concentrated poverty literature. This finding builds upon previous studies of mixed‐income housing settings that find limited interaction among residents (Rosenbaum et al, 1991; Pader and Breitbart, 1993; Breitbart and Pader, 1995; Hogan, 1996; Brophy and Smith, 1997; Rosenbaum, Stroh, and Flynn, 1998) and variation between groups in the level of neighboring (Kleit, 2005) by examining other social processes that may be affected by increasing the presence of higher‐income neighbors. The newcomers did act in ways that reinforced community norms of work, but their public actions were not dramatically different than the longer‐term residents, in part because of changes in management policy and practice following redevelopment and in part because of the shallow nature of the development's income mix.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By and large, the new residents in the mixed‐income Orchard Gardens development did not provide the social benefits that are often implied by the concentrated poverty literature. This finding builds upon previous studies of mixed‐income housing settings that find limited interaction among residents (Rosenbaum et al, 1991; Pader and Breitbart, 1993; Breitbart and Pader, 1995; Hogan, 1996; Brophy and Smith, 1997; Rosenbaum, Stroh, and Flynn, 1998) and variation between groups in the level of neighboring (Kleit, 2005) by examining other social processes that may be affected by increasing the presence of higher‐income neighbors. The newcomers did act in ways that reinforced community norms of work, but their public actions were not dramatically different than the longer‐term residents, in part because of changes in management policy and practice following redevelopment and in part because of the shallow nature of the development's income mix.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Most existing research has focused on one particular component of these social dynamics: the creation and use of social ties. While residents share the same physical neighborhood space, the amount of social mixing and interaction between income groups tends to be relatively modest (Rosenbaum et al, 1991; Pader and Breitbart, 1993; Breitbart and Pader, 1995; Hogan, 1996; Brophy and Smith, 1997; Rosenbaum, Stroh, and Flynn, 1998; Buron et al, 2002; Kleit, 2005). In a detailed study of the racially and ethnically diverse NewHolly HOPE VI development in Seattle, Kleit (2005) found that homeowners and public housing residents were more involved in the community and attended community events more frequently than tax credit renters.…”
Section: Neighborhood Redevelopment Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also directly addressed to the politics of redistribution is feminist work that takes on social policy issues in the context of neo-liberal urbanism, such as welfare and social housing reform (Cook et al, 2000;Miranne, 2000), homelessness (Klodawsky, forthcoming), or the implications of the privatisation of real property markets in post-socialist cities for how gender and class relations are conjugated at home and at work (Pavlovskaya & Hanson, 2001). At the same time, feminist work on such themes is traversed by a concern with the politics of recognition (Breitbart & Pader, 1995;Gilbert, 2000;Martin, 2002).…”
Section: Gendering the Urban And Spatialising Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geographers and urban scholars recognize the role of discourse in ''shaping how inner-city problems are conceptualized and what solutions get implemented'' (Crump 2002, 585) and the ways that discourse constructs public housing in people's minds (Breitbart and Pader 1995;Elliott et al 2004;Reichl 1999;Smith 1998Smith , 2000Vale 1993). Geographers and urban scholars are also not blind to the role of emotion in the racialization of public housing and public housing's larger context, the inner-city ghetto.…”
Section: Theory and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%