2017
DOI: 10.3178/hrl.11.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing flood damage functions for agricultural crops using estimated inundation depth and flood disaster statistics in data-scarce regions

Abstract: Abstract:Flood damage functions form the core of flood risk assessment. This study proposes a method for establishing flood damage functions for agricultural crops in data-scarce regions. The method assumes that the flood damage ratio is a function of inundation depth only and utilizes inundation depth estimated from flood extent information and hydro dynamic simulations. The parameters of the damage functions are calibrated through the SCEUA method (Shuffled Complex Evolution method developed at The Universit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, high and very high flash flood risk areas were detected which accounts for 42%, 26.5%, 22.9% and 8.6% of Huong Khe, Huong Son, Duc Tho, and Vu Quang Districts, respectively. This finding is similar to flash flood records ussually reported annually in Huong Khe (Nguyen and Ha, 2017;Nguyen et al, 2011;Nguyen et al, 2017b;Thuy and Mui, 2018), Huong Son (Nguyen et al, 2017a), Duc Tho (Thao et al, 2014) and Vu Quang (Nguyen et al, 2011). Most of these areas were located in Son Hong, Son Tay Huong Khe District: the total area of low risk was 90,928 ha accounting for 68.1.8% of the district area, followed by 21.1% (very low risk), 8.9% (medium risk), and 1.9% (high and very high risk).…”
Section: Assessment Of Flash Flood Riskssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Specifically, high and very high flash flood risk areas were detected which accounts for 42%, 26.5%, 22.9% and 8.6% of Huong Khe, Huong Son, Duc Tho, and Vu Quang Districts, respectively. This finding is similar to flash flood records ussually reported annually in Huong Khe (Nguyen and Ha, 2017;Nguyen et al, 2011;Nguyen et al, 2017b;Thuy and Mui, 2018), Huong Son (Nguyen et al, 2017a), Duc Tho (Thao et al, 2014) and Vu Quang (Nguyen et al, 2011). Most of these areas were located in Son Hong, Son Tay Huong Khe District: the total area of low risk was 90,928 ha accounting for 68.1.8% of the district area, followed by 21.1% (very low risk), 8.9% (medium risk), and 1.9% (high and very high risk).…”
Section: Assessment Of Flash Flood Riskssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Because agricultural losses depend so much on the type of agriculture -e.g. aquaculture and livestock lose more than crops -the extent to which oods affects crops also varies (Klaus et al, 2016;Nguyen et al, 2017). In general, crop losses are controlled by ood characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: Signi Cance and Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutta et al [61] validated flood extents with the model-driven flood of the 100-year return period. Some studies validated their estimated flood depth and crop loss function using point data from field surveys [30,78]. Since crop-specific flood loss estimation relies on crop cover mapping from remote sensing images, the accuracy of crop mapping is crucial for the precise crop-specific loss assessment.…”
Section: Approaches For the Validation Of Loss Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic stage-damage function for flood crop loss assessment. (a) Conceptual example of depth-duration-damage curve adapted from Shrestha et al[66] and Kwak et al[64]; (b) example of depth-damage curve showing a linear piecewise curve adapted from Amadio et al[12] and Mao et al[14]; (c) example of some other depth-damage curves (exponential, quadratic, and S-shape) adapted from Dutta et al[61], Van der Sande et al[49], Forte et al[29], Nguyen et al[78], and Win et al[68]; (d) conceptual example of tabular format of stage-damage function of loss assessment[62,65,70].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%