2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10051507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Design Strategies and an Assessment Tool of Home Appliances to Promote Sustainable Behavior for the New Poor

Abstract: Abstract:Environmental benefits related to home appliance life cycles depend on how these products are used. Designing home appliances that promote sustainable behavior is an effective way to reduce environmental impacts. This study aimed to increase relevant opportunities for promoting sustainable behavior practices on the new poor through home appliances, which is rarely discussed in the fields of design for sustainable behavior (DfSB) and product design. In particular, relevant assessment tools or indicator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, sharing or pooling products among several users helps reducing the product stock, as in the case of sharing washing machines in laundry facilities or in common rooms in apartment blocks (Amasawa et al, 2018;Cooper, 2005;Kjaer et al, 2019;Yates and Evans, 2016). Fifth, a reduce strategy emerged was using EEE in a more sustainable way (Laurenti et al, 2014;Tu et al, 2018). For instance, in the case of washing machines, by either lowering the temperature used for washing to reduce the energy consumption, saturating the washing machine capacity to reduce the number of washing cycle needed or by using the appropriate amount of detergents to avoid waste and leakages (Abeliotis et al, 2015;Alborzi et al, 2017b;Bocken et al, 2018;Laitala et al, 2011;Lasic and Stamminger, 2015;Morgan et al, 2018;Shahmohammadi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Actors and Life Cycle Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, sharing or pooling products among several users helps reducing the product stock, as in the case of sharing washing machines in laundry facilities or in common rooms in apartment blocks (Amasawa et al, 2018;Cooper, 2005;Kjaer et al, 2019;Yates and Evans, 2016). Fifth, a reduce strategy emerged was using EEE in a more sustainable way (Laurenti et al, 2014;Tu et al, 2018). For instance, in the case of washing machines, by either lowering the temperature used for washing to reduce the energy consumption, saturating the washing machine capacity to reduce the number of washing cycle needed or by using the appropriate amount of detergents to avoid waste and leakages (Abeliotis et al, 2015;Alborzi et al, 2017b;Bocken et al, 2018;Laitala et al, 2011;Lasic and Stamminger, 2015;Morgan et al, 2018;Shahmohammadi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Actors and Life Cycle Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies within the built environment scope used RGT to examine the applicability of physiological techniques in a housing project (Dayaratne, 2016), promote sustainable behavior practices (Tu et al, 2018), and avoid energy consumption (Cheah et al, 2018). RGT was also used to elicit users' perceptions of key attributes of UGS, understand the meanings of UGS (Taylor and Stough, 1978;Potter and Coshall, 1986;Selby, 2004;Home et al, 2007;Wan and Shen, 2015), provide planners with necessary tools (Home et al, 2010), identify spatial inequalities, and integrate it with multivariate analysis in geography (Potter, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the definition of the built environment cited earlier, these studies can be classified as either direct or indirect Frontiers in Built Environment frontiersin.org contributors to the field. Direct contributors included record 234 (Dayaratne, 2016), which used RGT to examine the applicability of physiological techniques in a housing project, and records 133 (Tu et al, 2018) and 135 (Cheah et al, 2018), which adopted RGT to promote sustainable behavior practices or avoid extra energy consumption. Additionally, records 26 (Ratnasingam et al, 2020), 209 (Lallemand and Koenig, 2017), 712 (Vassiliadis and Fotiadis, 2007), 1078 (Mitchell and Kiral, 1999), and 1088 (Mitchell and Kiral, 1998) used RGT to explore human-space interaction, user experience, and spatial experience; assess images of space, or determine material selection.…”
Section: Research Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another technology-based solutions were mentioned by Tu et al (2018). They proposed effective product design programs that promote sustainable behaviour of the new poor during product use (Design for Sustainable Behaviour).…”
Section: Table 1 Types and Popularity Of Anti Food Wastage Technologmentioning
confidence: 99%