2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Cooperative Relationships and Joint Risk Management in Construction Projects: Agency Theory Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be associated to the amount of risk involved in construction projects. Osipova (2015) observed that risks are inherent in all construction projects, which may negatively affect project delivery in terms of time, cost, and quality. If risks are not properly managed, the project stakeholders may seriously suffer from cost overruns, delays, or even project failures (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be associated to the amount of risk involved in construction projects. Osipova (2015) observed that risks are inherent in all construction projects, which may negatively affect project delivery in terms of time, cost, and quality. If risks are not properly managed, the project stakeholders may seriously suffer from cost overruns, delays, or even project failures (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process model of project manager replacement also offers several interesting points of departure as a means for examining extant leadership theory, most notably in identifying the remediation activities in which newly appointed project managers must engage. One tenant of agency theory presumes the primacy of maintaining positive and mutually supportive relationships between key organizational actors and influential stakeholders [49]. Thus, steps taken to repair and commodify these relationships (including those between the project manager and their team) as part of the remediation process are critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since CSCs have finite durations, temporary sites, and episodic relationships, they are more prone to classical agency challenges such as short-termism, opportunism, and high-risk exposure (Behera et al, 2015;Osipova, 2015). In addition to such internal transaction cost risks, CSCs are also prone to other externalities associated with fiscal crises, governance, and policy risks (Aloini et al, 2012;Fearne and Fowler, 2006).…”
Section: The Unique Characteristics Of Construction Supply Chains (Csc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike manufacturing supply chains, CSCs are characteristically temporary arrangements of multi-national stakeholders with public-private governance structures, which increases the tendency for mistrust, power imbalances and transaction cost risks (Briscoe and Dainty, 2005;Hartmann and Caerteling, 2010). Since CSCs have finite durations, temporary sites and episodic relationships, they are more prone to classical agency challenges such as short-termism, opportunism and high-risk exposure (Behera et al, 2015;Osipova, 2015). In addition to such internal transaction cost risks, CSCs are also prone to other externalities associated with fiscal crises, governance and policy risks (Aloini et al, 2012;Fearne and Fowler, 2006).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%