16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-3751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing Consensus Turbulence Statistics for Hot Subsonic Jets

Abstract: Many tasks in fluids engineering require knowledge of the turbulence in jets. There is a strong, although fragmented, literature base for low order statistics, such as jet spread and other meanvelocity field characteristics. Some sources, particularly for low speed cold jets, also provide turbulence intensities that are required for validating Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes. There are far fewer sources for jet spectra and for space-time correlations of turbulent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle data rate was typically 10 kHz for spectral measurements, with a measurement time of 60 s using equal temporal spacing mode; for velocity traverse data a rate of 4 kHz in transit time mode for 5 s was used; a population of 20 k validated readings was thus used to evaluate time-averaged statistics. It is important to note that seeding was added to the jet flow only, and no seeding was provided in the ambient flow entrained by the jet, as adopted for example in the jet flow studies of Bridges and Wernet (2010), or Guitton et al (2007). This has implications for the accuracy of measurements in the immediate vicinity of the jet/ambient edge.…”
Section: Experimental Details Instrumentation and Preliminary Measurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle data rate was typically 10 kHz for spectral measurements, with a measurement time of 60 s using equal temporal spacing mode; for velocity traverse data a rate of 4 kHz in transit time mode for 5 s was used; a population of 20 k validated readings was thus used to evaluate time-averaged statistics. It is important to note that seeding was added to the jet flow only, and no seeding was provided in the ambient flow entrained by the jet, as adopted for example in the jet flow studies of Bridges and Wernet (2010), or Guitton et al (2007). This has implications for the accuracy of measurements in the immediate vicinity of the jet/ambient edge.…”
Section: Experimental Details Instrumentation and Preliminary Measurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…anti-aliasing filters) to produce spectra in good agreement with HWA. Further application of the technique has mainly focussed on identification of a 'consensus' data set for (mainly 1-point) turbulence statistics for higher Mach number hot jets (Bridges & Wernet (2010), (2012)), no further attempts to measure 4 th -order correlations have been reported. Based on the above review the present work was aimed at producing direct measurements of , ij kl r in a representative jet flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of validating PIV by repeatability, consider Figure 1 which shows profiles of mean and turbulent velocity measured in the same jet rig over the course of seven years in seven different experiments, each employing different instrumentation as PIV technology progressed. This work was documented in [18]. An attempt was made, assuming the variability to have been caused by independent sources of error arising from the various measurement systems, to establish uncertainty bands about the various profiles.…”
Section: A Experimental Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%